2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing multi-stakeholder relationships in nonprofit organizations through multiple channels: A systematic review and research agenda for enhancing stakeholder relationship marketing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Offline trust requires the development of interpersonal interactions between the trustor and the trustee; hence, contrasting with online trust, offline trust can allow the trustor and the trustee to have a more in-depth understanding and knowledge-based judgment of each other for relationship building. While prior research noted the integration of offline and online channels in communication management (Mato-Santiso et al, 2021), the findings in this study suggested that the application and mechanism of integrative online and offline communication platforms for trust building and dialogic communication should be further examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Offline trust requires the development of interpersonal interactions between the trustor and the trustee; hence, contrasting with online trust, offline trust can allow the trustor and the trustee to have a more in-depth understanding and knowledge-based judgment of each other for relationship building. While prior research noted the integration of offline and online channels in communication management (Mato-Santiso et al, 2021), the findings in this study suggested that the application and mechanism of integrative online and offline communication platforms for trust building and dialogic communication should be further examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Beyond Kent and Taylor's (1998, 2002) discussion on dialogue and dialogic communication with the development of the world wide web, recent studies have addressed the relevance of various online communication platforms, particularly social media, to dialogic communication. For example, past research has noted that social media, which enables two-way communication between organizations and stakeholders and enhances dialogic communication (Chen et al , 2020; Fähnrich et al , 2020; Mato-Santiso et al , 2021; Syvänen and Valentini, 2020), is possibly an appropriate channel for dialogic communication in which mutuality and openness could facilitate organizations to develop dialogic communication with their stakeholders (Yang et al , 2015). Scholars also commented that online dialogic communication between organizations and stakeholders via social media facilitates information exchange, meaning or value co-creation, value-added interactions, networking, and the solicitation of opinions and/or new ideas (Chen et al , 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, the findings of Oncioiu, I. et al (2021) [49] confirmed that it is necessary to combine the traditional and digital channels of communication. Additionally, Key et al [90] and the authors Mato-Santiso et al [91] proved the necessity of mixing digital and offline channels to interact with the stakeholders of non-profit organizations [92]. Moreover, the results obtained by Lesscher et al [92] also showed the positive synergy between offline and online marketing channels for increasing consumer activity metrics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, there is a willingness to promote social change through communication in social networks. Despite the importance of stakeholder identification [100,101], there is no consolidated culture on this issue, and NGDOs do not dedicate sufficient resources to identify and strengthen relationships with other organizations that may be of interest to them.…”
Section: Conclusion Practical Implications Limitations and Future Lines Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%