Managing Pluralism: The European Case

Abstract

This article begins by clarifying the meanings attributed to pluralism; it then places the European case in a global context. The body of the article looks at the management of religious pluralism in Europe in terms of commonality and difference. At one and the same time, Europe is becoming increasingly secular and religiously plural-both trends are important if we are to understand the issues at stake. A close examination of four individual cases (Britain, France, the Netherlands and Greece) reveals, however, that it is important not to jump to conclusions regarding outcomes. Each country must be considered on its own terms. The final section introduces a rather different feature: the European Court of Human Rights, noting its place in the management of religious pluralism. A growing jurisprudence emanating from the Court is becoming increasingly influential.

The Marginality of ‘Irish Mormonism’

“…Jason's experience is reflective of the complexity of managing religious pluralism in modernity as described by Davie (2000Davie ( , 2014. In noting tendencies within Europe to welcome acceptance of ethnic diversity whilst rejecting religious diversity, Davie (2014, p. 616) reminds us that 'the management of ethnic pluralism overlaps with the management of religious pluralism but is not coterminous with it'.…”