Managing School Safety in Thailand

Srichai, Pachernwaat; Yodmongkol, Pitipong; Sureephong, Pradorn; Meksamoot, Komsak

doi:10.1177/2158244013489985

Cited by 8 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…TQM tools and techniques, proposed mainly by Crosby and Deming, lead to greater quality outcomes in academic areas (Yoshida, 1994; Crawford and Shutler, 1999; Hofman et al , 2008; LeMahieu et al , 2017). Expanding the quality journey, it has also been proposed that Lean philosophy can be applied in the education sector to improve classroom teaching (LeMahieu et al , 2017) and control the cost, bureaucracy and waste associated with managing educational institutions (Srichai et al , 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Findings of quality management studies in primary and secondary education: a systematic literature review

Bouranta

Psomas

Antony

2020

TQM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe aim of this paper is to present the main findings of the studies in the field of quality management (QM) in primary and secondary education. Grouping these findings into themes and these themes, in turn, into broad categories as well as prioritizing the themes of findings are also aims of the present study.Design/methodology/approachA systematic literature review (SLR) of articles focusing on QM in primary and secondary education was carried out based on major publishers, namely Emerald Online, Taylor and Francis, Elsevier/Science Direct, Springer Link, Sage Publishing and Online. In total, 133 articles published in 62 journals during 1983–2019 were collected. The affinity diagram was applied in order to group the findings of the QM studies into logical themes and these themes into broad categories. Moreover, the Pareto diagram was applied to prioritize the themes revealed.FindingsA plethora of articles focusing on QM in primary and secondary education have been published in the last decades. The findings of the QM studies presented in the 133 reviewed articles are grouped into 43 themes and these themes, in turn, into 6 broad categories, namely management practices, school characteristics, teachers, stakeholders, government and pupils. The analysis also reveals themes that can be characterized as “vital” and “useful.”Practical implicationsResearchers and school managers can take into consideration the findings of the QM studies in primary and secondary education as well as the themes of high priority for the design of future studies and QM implementation plans, respectively.Originality/valueThis is the first literature review study which presents analytically the findings of the QM studies in primary and secondary education. This study also contributes to the literature by formulating meaningful themes of these findings and broad categories of these themes and by prioritizing the themes revealed.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Findings of quality management studies in primary and secondary education: a systematic literature review

Bouranta

Psomas

Antony

2020

TQM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Analysis of the article content with the relevant categories "state", "health", and "education" shows that these publications are devoted to political (organizational and administrative), and police measures in the area of public security connected with health protection [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]; food security [26][27][28]; protection from threats and violence in educational sphere [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]; urban security [41][42][43][44][45][46][47]; and protection from crime and terrorism [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. These life spheres and human behavior are evaluated for external risks and physical threats with preventive or reactive impacts on the environment and social relations being the factors and tools of protection from them.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Security or Safety: Quantitative and Comparative Analysis of Usage in Research Works Published in 2004–2019

Bubnovskaia

Leonidova

Lysova

2019

Behavioral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article is devoted to the statistical analysis of security and safety frequency in the context of categories connected with social institutions and personality features in research works from 2004–2019. Research was based on the following methods: quantitative analysis of safety frequency in the context with coded “categories” related to social institutions and personality features; analysis was conducted with computer-assisted content analysis QDA Miner Lite v. 1.4 and Fisher’s F-test. An analysis of 1157 works showed that the terms “security” and “safety” were quantitatively more frequent when used with concepts related to social institutions than with concepts related to personality features. In our opinion, this qualitative trend shows the prevailing significance of social aspects of security over its personal (psychological) traits for research analysis and practical social aspects. The priority usage of the terms “security” and “safety” can be related to the securitization of society, (i.e., to the increased role and significance of social ways of providing security and protection from threats), primarily with the help of external law-enforcing actors such as the state, police, and army. Securitization counterweights the development of social and psychological mechanisms of security—developing motivation for safe behavior, personal self-regulation, and self-production of security as an internal feeling of protection.

show abstract

“…There are many definitions of what constitutes a safe school, for example [63]. "Safe learning environment" is defined by L. Holley and S. Steiner in [64].…”

Section: Bibliometric Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Will AI Become a Threat to Higher Education Sustainability? A Study of Students’ Views

Okulich-Kazarin,

Artyukhov,

Skowron

et al. 2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Universities started to use artificial intelligence (AI) tools to improve the quality of higher education services. However, the rapid adoption of AI tools in higher education (HE) may lead to sustainability issues. On the one hand, there are prerequisites for using AI tools to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4). On the other hand, as consumers of educational services (stakeholders), students have their own opinions about using AI in the educational process. The purpose of this study was to explore students’ opinions on the use of artificial intelligence tools in higher education. The authors analyzed student responses to the question: “Do you think AI threatens higher education in the next five years?” The authors formulated this question based on the definition of “a safe learning environment”, which is associated with a “safe” learning environment (SDG 4.3). The authors made use of a literature review, a bibliometric analysis of 5000 sources, a survey of 1104 students from eight universities in Eastern Europe through cloud technologies to host a special electronic questionnaire, statistical processing of questionnaires, and testing of statistical hypotheses. The authors formulated and tested two pairs of competing statistical hypotheses. Finally, the authors obtained three new scientific facts based on the respondents’ answers. New scientific facts were obtained using a standard level of statistical hypothesis testing (α = 0.05). The main scientific fact is that 10.17% to 35.42% of students think that Artificial Intelligence threatens higher education. According to student opinions, AI may hurt the sustainability of higher education (SDG 4.3). The authors are confident that new scientific facts help conceptualize and promote didactic theory and practice. The study results are needed to predict, plan, and implement organizational, pedagogical, and methodological measures aimed at SDG 4.3 through a “safe” learning environment while further expanding the use of AI in higher education.

show abstract

Managing School Safety in Thailand

Cited by 8 publications

References 39 publications

Findings of quality management studies in primary and secondary education: a systematic literature review

Findings of quality management studies in primary and secondary education: a systematic literature review

Security or Safety: Quantitative and Comparative Analysis of Usage in Research Works Published in 2004–2019

Will AI Become a Threat to Higher Education Sustainability? A Study of Students’ Views

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About