2008
DOI: 10.1108/17465640810920278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing spoiled identities: dirty workers' struggles for a favourable sense of self

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to explore how a group of dirty workers, that is, exotic dancers employed in a gentlemen's club, engage in identity construction amidst various macro, meso and micro considerations.Design/methodology/approach -This study adopts a social constructivist approach in exploring the stories of a group of 21 dancers employed at a chain of exotic dancing clubs in the UK, For Your Eyes Only.Findings -Identity construction is a complex process whereby dancers struggle to secure a po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By affirming the necessity and worth of working with dirt, by reorienting our understanding of dirty work in terms of care of the environment and the vulnerable, and by constructing an inter-occupational hierarchy of stigmatisation (Grandy 2008) and an intra-occupational hierarchy of esteem, those who labour in what others see as lowstatus occupations assert a sense of value, self-worth and self-respect that has been identified as essential to workplace dignity (Hodson 2001;Bolton 2007). However, in contra-distinction to Grandy and Maven's (2014) point concerning the considerable effort often required to attain dignity, the garbage collectors did not seem to have to work hard at attaining dignity.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…By affirming the necessity and worth of working with dirt, by reorienting our understanding of dirty work in terms of care of the environment and the vulnerable, and by constructing an inter-occupational hierarchy of stigmatisation (Grandy 2008) and an intra-occupational hierarchy of esteem, those who labour in what others see as lowstatus occupations assert a sense of value, self-worth and self-respect that has been identified as essential to workplace dignity (Hodson 2001;Bolton 2007). However, in contra-distinction to Grandy and Maven's (2014) point concerning the considerable effort often required to attain dignity, the garbage collectors did not seem to have to work hard at attaining dignity.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In hierarchical terms, garbage workers put themselves above those who were unemployed or who left the occupation because they could not cope with its physical, social and symbolic demands. In that sense, there is a stigmatisation of hierarchy (Grandy 2008) as they view themselves as less tainted and more legitimate than these others. Acknowledging that many people held them in low regard, and that the job was tainted, a common response was to stress the point that they had a job.…”
Section: Hierarchic Esteemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Those working in stigmatised occupations are likely to confront criticism and disapproval from a variety of sources, including the general public, media, customers and even family and friends (Grandy and Mavin, 2012;Hallgrimsdottir, Phillips and Benoit, 2006;Simpson et al, 2012). As a result, identity construction for dirty workers can be particularly complex and they engage in a number of strategies to construct and negotiate boundaries to manage the stigma they experience (e.g., distancing, dividing up their social world, projecting disgust, infusing the work with positive value, building strong subcultures) (Ashforth et al, 2007;Grandy, 2008;Tracy and Trethewey, 2005). Considerable literature has explored the emotion work inherent in these noted strategies, specifically the emotional labour required by individuals employed in dirty work occupations such as prison guards (Crawley, 2004), tour reps (Guerrier and Adib, 2003), prostitutes (Sanders, 2005) and exotic dancers (Barton, 2002;Fogel and Quinlan, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%