2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing the dominant follicle in lactating dairy cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
66
1
12

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
6
66
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…This highlights the caution that is required when supplementing P4; it may be that strategies aimed at stimulating the development of the endogenous CL (e.g. manipulation of preovulatory follicle development (Wiltbank et al 2011) or administration of luteotrophic agents such as hCG (De Rensis et al 2010;Lonergan 2011;Rizos et al 2012)) rather than supplementation with exogenous P4 will be most effective. Alternatively, a combination of exogenous P4 and luteal support may prove beneficial in achieving a balancing between the apparent negative effects of P4 supplementation on development of the CL and the positive effects on conceptus development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This highlights the caution that is required when supplementing P4; it may be that strategies aimed at stimulating the development of the endogenous CL (e.g. manipulation of preovulatory follicle development (Wiltbank et al 2011) or administration of luteotrophic agents such as hCG (De Rensis et al 2010;Lonergan 2011;Rizos et al 2012)) rather than supplementation with exogenous P4 will be most effective. Alternatively, a combination of exogenous P4 and luteal support may prove beneficial in achieving a balancing between the apparent negative effects of P4 supplementation on development of the CL and the positive effects on conceptus development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to reducing follicle dominance, the 5-day protocol resulted in the ovulation of follicles that were ∼1.5 mm smaller in diameter (17.1 v. 18.5 mm; Santos et al, 2010a). It has been suggested that P/AI in the Ovsynch protocol is optimised in high-producing Holstein cows when the ovulatory follicle diameter is neither too small nor too large (Wiltbank et al, 2011). Small follicle diameter does not seem to affect fertility of cows inseminated to oestrus, but excessively large follicles usually decrease P/AI because of extended dominance (Wiltbank et al, 2011).…”
Section: Optimising Timed Ai Programmesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that P/AI in the Ovsynch protocol is optimised in high-producing Holstein cows when the ovulatory follicle diameter is neither too small nor too large (Wiltbank et al, 2011). Small follicle diameter does not seem to affect fertility of cows inseminated to oestrus, but excessively large follicles usually decrease P/AI because of extended dominance (Wiltbank et al, 2011). However, for cows inseminated following timed AI, follicle diameter between 15 and 19 mm seems to be ideal (Souza et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the results of the present trial showed a greater diameter of the LF at TAI after eCG treatment. The optimisation of follicle size and health is an important objective in current TAI programmes (Wiltbank et al, 2011). Larger ovulatory follicles exhibited a greater growth and ovulation rate and resulted in a greater number of pregnancies per artificial insemination in beef cattle (Perry et al, 2007;Sá Filho et al, 2010b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%