Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View

Post, James E.; Preston, Lee E.; Sachs, Sybille

doi:10.2307/41166151

Cited by 749 publications

(543 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

480

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, drawing on Kirchoff et al [24] and Post et al [45], another explanation can lie in the distinction between primary and secondary stakeholders. In our setting, the shippers would belong to the primary stakeholders of the LSPs, why the arguments directed towards the potential customers (i.e.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One division is suggested by Post et al [45]: the corporation is viewed first in the context of stakeholders that are parts of its resource base, which in turn is part of industry structures, which is finally part of the social political arena. Stakeholders belonging to the resource base are more directly important to the corporation's wealth than the ones in the industry structure, etc.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Stakeholders belonging to the resource base are more directly important to the corporation's wealth than the ones in the industry structure, etc. Post et al [45] further suggest that the corporation to a higher degree must consider the interest of the resource base group of stakeholders, which in their model includes investors, shareowners, and lenders; employees; and customers and users. This group is referred to by Kirchoff et al [24] as the primary stakeholder group.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This group is referred to by Kirchoff et al [24] as the primary stakeholder group. The industry structure group [45] includes, e.g., supply chain associates and regulatory authorities, and the social political area gathers more general interest groups such as governments, citizens, and local communities. Kirchoff et al [24] refer to these groups as secondary stakeholders.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Environmental practices as offerings and requirements on the logistics market

Martinsen

Huge‐Brodin

2014

Logist. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Environmental practices as offerings and requirements on the logistics market

Martinsen

Huge‐Brodin

2014

Logist. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Clarkson, 1995;Donaldson & Preston, 1995;Freeman, 1984;Mitchell, Agle, & Wood, 1997;Post, Preston, & Sachs, 2002). Freeman (1984) defines stakeholders as any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the firm's objectives.…”

Section: Stakeholder Theory: Shifting the Focusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reporting on sustainable operations by third sector organizations: A signalling approach

Simaens

Koster

2013

Public Management Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An institutional approach to sustainable operations and procurement by third sector organizations SummaryAwareness of (un)sustainable operations is increasing in both academic research and practice.However, little is known about sustainable operations within the third sector. When it comes to sustainable practices, the role played by third sector organizations, and especially non-governmental organizations, has mostly been regarded as advocacy. We shift this traditional perspective by analyzing sustainability of internal operations, including procurement, by third sector organizations.Institutional theory is used to discuss the reporting trends that were found in a document analysis of reports by third sector organizations. We present research lines that might allow understanding drivers and constraints of such (reporting) practices.

show abstract

Environmental Assessment

Steyn¹

2018

The International Encyclopedia of Strategic Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The proposed adtions are to grant a right-of-way to Southwestern Public Service (SPS) for the construction of an overhead powerfine. and f o r SPS to construct a new replacement substation o f Department of Energy (DOE) managed lands at the Waste Isolation,Pilot Plant (WIPP). The W E proposes to fund both of these actions. (BLM), in accordance with the Memorandum of Understandins Between the U. S. Debarment of Enerw and the U. S. Denartment of the Interior, dated July 19, 1994, is preparing this EA to analyze these related actions, since the majority of the impacts of these actions would be experienced on ELM managed lands. and Lea Counties, New Mexico. The legal land description is: The poles wou1,d be spaced approximately 700 feet apart. Some of the structures will also include guy wires. The line will be used year round f o r a 30 year period. Length of the line will be 19.8 miles (104,544 feet) and will have a right-of-way width of 60 feet'. The majority of the line would parallel an existing powerfine and road right-of-way corridor (see attached map). The proposed new ring-bus substation would measure approximately 300 feet north to south and 160 feet east to west. The substation would be The powerfine would not traverse any A line. The structure for this line will be a 2-pole H frame wood poles. designed and constructed for 115,000 volt operation. The design would allow.for power to be supplied to the WIPP from either or both transmission lines (new line from Sand Dunes/Ochoa and existing line from No. 1/Potash JNC) and substation transformers. Two 13,800 volt underground feeders will be routed from the ring-bus substation-100 feet north, then west-150 feet, then south-100 feet to the WIPP'S existing SPS plant substation. The new substation would be enclosed by a chain link fence: 7 feet in height with 3-strand barbed wire, 45 degree security top slanted outward from the substation proper. If the new electrical facilities were approved and became operational, WIPP's existing temporary substation would then be demolished. Demolition would include removal of all equipment, concrete slabs, structures, fences, overhead 69,000 volt transmission lines, utility poles, and underground cable. Construction of the line and substation would be e pected to sometime in January of 1996 and would be completed by March of 1996. No temporary work areas would be required for this powerline project. The proposed action is 1) to grant a right-of-way to SPS for the construction of a 115 KV in accordance with the Standard Stipulations f o r Overhead Powerlines in the R m e l l District, ELM (refer to the Grant, Exhibit A) , and 2) for ttia SPS to construct a new substation of WIPP lands as described above. SPS would retain ownership and maintenance responsibilities for both the powerline and substation. B. The WIPP is anticipated to require increased electrical capacity, reliability, and operational flexibility. The existing, temporary single-feed WIPP substation and single power line does not provide a redundant power source and...

show abstract

Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View

Cited by 749 publications

References 15 publications

Environmental practices as offerings and requirements on the logistics market

Environmental practices as offerings and requirements on the logistics market

Reporting on sustainable operations by third sector organizations: A signalling approach

Environmental Assessment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About