Managing the risk of Hendra virus spillover in Australia using ecological approaches: A report on three community juries

Abstract

BackgroundHendra virus (HeV) infection is endemic in Australian flying-fox populations. Habitat loss has increased the peri-urban presence of flying-foxes, increasing the risk of contact and therefore viral ‘spillovers’ into horse and human populations. An equine vaccine is available and horse-husbandry practices that minimize HeV exposure are encouraged, but their adoption is suboptimal. Ecological approaches–such as habitat creation and conservation–could complement vaccination and behavioural strategies by reducing spillover risks, but these are controversial.MethodsWe convened three community juries (two regional; one metropolitan) to elicit the views of well-informed citizens on the acceptability of adding ecological approaches to current interventions for HeV risk. Thirty-one participants of diverse backgrounds, mixed genders and ages were recruited using random-digit-dialling. Each jury was presented with balanced factual evidence, given time to ask questions of expert presenters and, after deliberation, come to well-reasoned conclusions.ResultsAll juries voted unanimously that ecological strategies should be included in HeV risk management strategies but concluded that current interventions–including vaccination and changing horse-husbandry practices–must remain the priority. The key reasons given for adopting ecological approaches were: (i) they address underlying drivers of disease emergence, (ii) the potential to prevent spillover of other bat-borne pathogens, and (iii) there would be broader community benefits. Juries differed regarding the best mechanism to create/conserve flying-fox habitat: participants in regional centres favoured direct government action, whereas the metropolitan jury preferred to place the burden on landholders.ConclusionsInformed citizens acknowledge the value of addressing the drivers of bat-borne infectious risks but differ substantially as to the best implementation strategies. Ecological approaches to securing bat habitat could find broad social support in Australia, but disagreement about how best to achieve them indicates the need for negotiation with affected communities to co-develop fair, effective and locally appropriate policies.

Priority allocation of pandemic influenza vaccines in Australia – Recommendations of 3 community juries

“…While a small group cannot statistically represent ‘the general public’, participants are recruited to capture a diversity of experiences and backgrounds in a community [21] , and so can suggest what an inclusive and informed public would advise, given factual information and time to deliberate [20] , [22] , [23] . Community juries have been used in Australia and elsewhere to consider issues surrounding infectious disease control and prevention [24] , [25] , including the appropriateness of different measures that can be used in response to a pandemic [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] .…”

Citizens' juries give verdict on whether private practice veterinarians should attend unvaccinated Hendra virus suspect horses

“…The juries' verdicts in response to this question, their reasoning, and a detailed report on the conduct, content and analysis of each of these deliberative events are reported elsewhere. 36 In this paper we report on the response of each jury to PART B, which addressed the following question:…”

Qualitative Research for One Health: From Methodological Principles to Impactful Applications

“…Deliberative engagement can also allow opportunities for members of the public to reframe public and health policy problems in terms that are important to them, and promote imaginative engagement with different policy options and potential futures (90). For example, one of the authors have run a series of Citizens'/Community juries convened in eastern Australia have involved citizens and members of affected communities in discussions about how best to manage the present and future risks of Hendra virus spill-over events in their local area (91). The outcomes indicate that members of the public are likely to strongly support ecological approaches to mitigating the risks of Hendra virus risks when informed of the relevant facts and dilemmas, but there is fundamental disagreement as to the most appropriate mechanisms to regulate land use change, and, thereby, create or better protect flying fox habitat.…”