2011
DOI: 10.1890/es11-00114.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing uncertainty in climate-driven ecological models to inform adaptation to climate change

Abstract: Abstract. The impacts of climate change on forest ecosystems are likely to require changes in forest planning and natural resource management. Changes in tree growth, disturbance extent and intensity, and eventually species distributions are expected. In natural resource management and planning, ecosystem models are typically used to provide a ''best estimate'' about how forests might work in the future and thus guide decision-making. Ecosystem models can be used to develop forest management strategies that an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a consensus that climate change will bring about long-term adverse impacts not only on water resources (IPCC, 2007) but also on agriculture (Nelson et al, 2009), ecosystems (Littell, McKenzie, Kerns, Cushman, & Shaw, 2011), and human and environmental health (Patz, Campbell-Lendrum, Holloway, & Foley, 2005;Malik, Awan, & Khan, 2012). The effect on water availability is likely to be profound and will affect agricultural production (IPCC, 2007;Parry, Rosenzweig, Iglesias, Livermore, & Fischer, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a consensus that climate change will bring about long-term adverse impacts not only on water resources (IPCC, 2007) but also on agriculture (Nelson et al, 2009), ecosystems (Littell, McKenzie, Kerns, Cushman, & Shaw, 2011), and human and environmental health (Patz, Campbell-Lendrum, Holloway, & Foley, 2005;Malik, Awan, & Khan, 2012). The effect on water availability is likely to be profound and will affect agricultural production (IPCC, 2007;Parry, Rosenzweig, Iglesias, Livermore, & Fischer, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include data cleaning for elimination of spurious and misidentified records, selection of non-correlated predictors and analysis of their fitted response functions, consideration of the sampling bias, and use of sensitivity analyses to evaluate the impact of model calibration decisions (Elith and Leathwick, 2009). However, other sources of uncertainty, such as the inherent uncertainty of climate change projections, are irreducible, but can be explicitly dealt with using established methods (Littell et al, 2011). For example, Snover et al (2013) provide a structured approach and general guidelines for selecting climate-change scenarios for ecological impact assessment and conservation decision making, which can be applied to provenance selection.…”
Section: Dealing With Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic risks also need to be evaluated through a genetic risk framework (Byrne et al, 2011), and taken into account in this decision-making process. Ensemble analysis is another example of an approach to deal with uncertainty in climate projections, and which characterizes and maps the consensus across different global climate models (Littell et al, 2011). Finally, Lee-Yaw et al (2016) also suggest combining SDMs and reciprocal transplantation experiments to iteratively reduce the uncertainty on both approaches.…”
Section: Dealing With Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the "tried-and-true" SRES pathways have seen much use not only in climate modeling but also for ecosystem models of many kinds [Littell et al, 2011]. In contrast, the RCPs are expected to be the paradigm for the future, but have a much shorter history, although experiments are now underway [Taylor et al, 2012].…”
Section: As Simple As Possible But No Simpler (Einstein)mentioning
confidence: 99%