2008
DOI: 10.1177/1403494807085304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing with maps? The development and institutionalization of a map-based health management information system in Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract: Sample outputs and statistics for one district (Chindwara) from the system are presented. There were 20.35 trained doctors in rural areas and 72.78 in urban areas per 100,000 population. Preliminary experience after a year, advantages, constraints (both systemic limitations and weakness in the mHMIS) to optimal usage, and future prospects for use in this setting are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Providers in (a) and (b) are employed either in the public and/or private sectors, while those in (c) work only in the private sector. More detailed descriptions of each of these groups are provided in our earlier publication [5,15].…”
Section: Healthcare Providersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providers in (a) and (b) are employed either in the public and/or private sectors, while those in (c) work only in the private sector. More detailed descriptions of each of these groups are provided in our earlier publication [5,15].…”
Section: Healthcare Providersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper discusses the suitability of this provider mix in dealing with maternal and child health, a major health priority in this province. Costa et al 2008). A questionnaire (in Hindi) was developed with the participation of the Department of Health at the provincial and district levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 1,038 person-months were invested in the survey, which covered the 52,117 villages and 394 towns of the province. Details of the survey methodology, pilot tests, and supervision methods have been described earlier (De Costa et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%