2013
DOI: 10.1108/s2051-5030(2013)0000013011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mandatory non-anthropocentrism: The political unrealism of making metaethical demands in environmental ethics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By shifting the reader's perspective beyond anthropocentric framings, and focusing on animal issues and the environmental challenges with the help of a non-human lens, the novels in my study encourage the reader's "mandatory non-anthropocentrism" (Dockstader, 2013). By questioning the assumed moral superiority of humans over other species -a crucial question of environmental ethics philosophy highlighted by Brennan and Lo (2016) -these novels assign intrinsic value to the natural environment and animals.…”
Section: Eco-centrism and Environmental Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By shifting the reader's perspective beyond anthropocentric framings, and focusing on animal issues and the environmental challenges with the help of a non-human lens, the novels in my study encourage the reader's "mandatory non-anthropocentrism" (Dockstader, 2013). By questioning the assumed moral superiority of humans over other species -a crucial question of environmental ethics philosophy highlighted by Brennan and Lo (2016) -these novels assign intrinsic value to the natural environment and animals.…”
Section: Eco-centrism and Environmental Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Acknowledging the issue of didacticism, my study explores ways in which an environmentally ethical position can be conveyed to young readers without moralizing. For instance, by showcasing environmental issues from the perspective of a tree character in A Monster Calls, the non-anthropocentric narrative challenges the simplistic duality of right and the wrong in human attitudes to nature, and implicitly guides the reader to what Dockstader (2013) and Brennan and Lo (2016) might call an environmentally ethical position.…”
Section: Eco-centrism and Environmental Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation