Mandatory Reporting of Elder Abuse: Between a Rock and a Hard Place

Abstract

PURPOSE Despite mandated reporting laws that require physicians to report elder abuse, physicians have low rates of reporting. The purpose of this study was to identify physician's perspectives on mandated reporting of elder abuse.METHODS Individual, semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 primary care physicians practicing in a variety of settings and caring for a diverse patient population in the Los Angeles area. Interviewers collected information on physicians' perspectives about factors that may infl uence physicians' likelihood to report elder abuse. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed using a grounded theory approach based on the constant comparative method and the emergence of the core category of paradox to best account for the most problematic elder abuse situations faced by physicians.RESULTS During the interviews 3 paradoxes were expressed by physicians about the mandatory reporting of elder abuse. Specifi cally, mandatory reporting was related to both perceptions of increases and decreases in physician-patient rapport, patient quality of life, and physician control or ability to decide what is in the best interest of the patient. These paradoxes appear to be primarily hidden or unconscious, yet they infl uence the conscious decision process of whether to report.CONCLUSIONS Primary care physicians appear to be subject to paradoxes of reporting that contribute to the underreporting of elder abuse. These paradoxes and alternative modes of managing paradoxes are important and should be addressed in educational and training programs for physicians, and systematic evaluation of these issues may help to inform future legislation in this area. Further studies are needed to assess the generalizability of these fi ndings to other groups of clinicians.

Detection and Intervention Strategies by Primary Health Care Professionals in Suspected Elder Abuse

“…Although this problem is considered by many authors as rarely reported by health professionals, and despite the fact that they occupy a privileged position to do so, 10,20,24,25 the present study showed a good relationship between the cases in which there was suspicion and reporting. Indeed, of the 78 (61.4%) participants who mentioned to have suspected of at least one event of abuse, 83.3% reported the situation.…”

The Turkish Adaptation of The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: a Validity and Reliability Study

“…1). Same concern about the future life quality of older person was also mentioned in a study conducted in USA (13). Accordingly, there is an apparent clash in legal and ethical responsibilities.…”

In This Issue: Capacity for Caring and Generating New Knowledge

“…4 This study shows how simple, well-meaning policies can lead to complexity and ambiguity at the point of application that alter the intended consequences.…”