2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mandibular midline distraction: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(222 reference statements)
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a systematic review, de Gijt et al 7 clearly described a higher incidence of irritation and gingivitis in bone-borne devices compared to dental-borne distractors. A possible downside to the use of a tooth-borne distractor might be the less proportionate vertical bony expansion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a systematic review, de Gijt et al 7 clearly described a higher incidence of irritation and gingivitis in bone-borne devices compared to dental-borne distractors. A possible downside to the use of a tooth-borne distractor might be the less proportionate vertical bony expansion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Overall, the results in the literature suggest a more proportionate vertical expansion created by bone-borne distractors. 1,8,9 However, de Gijt et al 7 stated that most articles were of low statistical power and controversies remain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transverse mandibular discrepancy is characterized by unilateral or bilateral cross-bite, a tapered mandibular arch, crowded misaligned anterior teeth and a narrow inter-canine width [ 1-3 ]. Minor transverse mandibular discrepancies are generally corrected by orthodontic dental compensation, dental extraction, dental arch expansion or inter-approximal tooth stripping, whereas severe mandibular transverse discrepancies necessitates surgical intervention due to an early fusion of the symphysis and lack of a mandibular midsagittal suture [ 1 , 3 , 4 ]. Transverse mandibular widening following a midline osteotomy and lateral rotation of the two hemi-mandible segments with an interpositional grafting material is a safe and predictable treatment modality for correction of moderate transverse mandibular discrepancies [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transverse mandibular widening following a midline osteotomy and lateral rotation of the two hemi-mandible segments with an interpositional grafting material is a safe and predictable treatment modality for correction of moderate transverse mandibular discrepancies [ 5 ]. However, this surgical intervention is rarely used in patients with severe mandibular transverse discrepancies due to an increased risk of periodontal problems and relapse [ 1 , 2 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation