2020
DOI: 10.1177/1055665620946985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mandibular Reconstruction Following Central Giant Cell Granuloma Resection in Primary Dentition: A Case for the Use of a Costochondral Graft

Abstract: Central giant cell granuloma is a benign, intraosseous lesion that may affect the pediatric craniofacial skeleton, particularly the mandible. When surgery is indicated, the role of the craniofacial surgeon is to ameliorate the sequelae of ablative surgery by restoring facial symmetry, ensuring appropriate postoperative occlusion, and allowing for adequate interincisal opening, all in the setting of a growing craniofacial skeleton. Herein, we report the case of a 3-year-old female presenting for reconstruction … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously reported on the latter in a complex case of central giant cell granuloma of the mandible in a 3 year-old child, in which a costochondral graft was utilized in a similar manner to its well described role in hemifacial microsomia. 20 For our 6 year-old patient in this report, the oncoplastic approach involved separate osteotomies of the zygomatic body and arch via typical incisions employed in trauma cases (e.g., bicoronal incision, subtarsal incision, and intraoral maxillary vestibular incision). Corodonidectomy was also performed via an intraoral mandibular vestibular incision to access the inferior portion of the tumor with the mouth maximally propped open, akin to what would be performed for a case of pediatric temporomandibular joint ankylosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have previously reported on the latter in a complex case of central giant cell granuloma of the mandible in a 3 year-old child, in which a costochondral graft was utilized in a similar manner to its well described role in hemifacial microsomia. 20 For our 6 year-old patient in this report, the oncoplastic approach involved separate osteotomies of the zygomatic body and arch via typical incisions employed in trauma cases (e.g., bicoronal incision, subtarsal incision, and intraoral maxillary vestibular incision). Corodonidectomy was also performed via an intraoral mandibular vestibular incision to access the inferior portion of the tumor with the mouth maximally propped open, akin to what would be performed for a case of pediatric temporomandibular joint ankylosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While "oncoplastic" approaches have been described in other anatomic regions for soft tissue surgery (e.g., breast cancer surgery), analogous approaches in craniomaxillofacial surgery have heretofore not been emphasized. [18][19][20] The current case also represents an example of the incorporation of mixed reality and computeraided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technologies in the planning of pterygomaxillary tumor resection and reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…described two types of clinical progression (Table 1). 5 Surgery is considered the rst therapeutic option for CGCG, 4 however, reconstruction of these ablative defects is challenging, and a wide variety of reconstructive procedures have been described. This case report presents a case of mandibular reconstruction following resection of a CGCG using a Patient Speci c Implant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12] Los defectos óseos mandibu-www.medigraphic.org.mx lares causados por cirugía de diversas patologías, traumatismos faciales o sus secuelas pueden ser tratados con una amplia variedad de opciones en la actualidad. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Una alternativa para la reconstrucción de defectos mandibulares es el uso de injertos óseos autólogos no vascularizados. 21 Los injertos óseos autólogos ofrecen grandes y mayores beneficios comparados con los aloinjertos, xenoinjertos o aloplásticos empleados para la reconstrucción de defectos óseos mandibulares.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified