1949
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-194903000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mandibular Reconstruction, World War Ii

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1951
1951
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 The literature is replete with articles discussing secondary reconstruction with non vascularized bone grafts including multiple clinical controversy sections within the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. [2][3][4][5][6][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Despite this, very few have discussed primary reconstruction in the context of the patient with a benign lesion while excluding patients with malignancy, radiation therapy, or significant soft tissue defects. Frequently cited articles by Millard et al in 1969 andLawson et al in 1981 reported high failure rates for immediate reconstruction.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The literature is replete with articles discussing secondary reconstruction with non vascularized bone grafts including multiple clinical controversy sections within the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. [2][3][4][5][6][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Despite this, very few have discussed primary reconstruction in the context of the patient with a benign lesion while excluding patients with malignancy, radiation therapy, or significant soft tissue defects. Frequently cited articles by Millard et al in 1969 andLawson et al in 1981 reported high failure rates for immediate reconstruction.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Website: https://www.banglajol.info/index.php/UpDCJ War I using grafting to treat mandibular defects 8 . The introduction of internal fixation using plate and screws post World War II with the advantage of using antibiotics gave surgeons high success rate over the previous procedures 9 . The next thing adopted were free, nonvascularized, bone grafts 10 , harvested in distant locations and held in place, at the receptor site, by metallic reconstruction plates, usually titanium.…”
Section: Affiliationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next thing adopted were free, nonvascularized, bone grafts 10 , harvested in distant locations and held in place, at the receptor site, by metallic reconstruction plates, usually titanium. Several bones, such as tibia, iliac crest, or ribs, were often used as donor sites 9 . Use of threaded Kirschner (K) wire in 47 patients were reported by Castermans et al 11 in 1977.…”
Section: Affiliationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…World War II saw large numbers of patients requiring facial restoration, promoting the extensive use of bone grafts for mandibular surgery. 9 Although various kinds of skeletal sources had been explored, most surgeons preferred autogenous rib 10,11 or ilium, 12,13 particularly for composite resection of the tongue, jaw, and neck. 14 Autogenous bone grafts remained a mainstay of mandibular reconstruction afterwards.…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%