2017
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1601721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mandrills use olfaction to socially avoid parasitized conspecifics

Abstract: Mandrills use olfactory cues from feces of conspecifics to evaluate parasite status and avoid social contact with infectious animals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
168
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
168
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, Poirotte et al. ). Mandrills ( Mandrillus sphinx ) are able to exclude conspecifics infected by endoparasites by avoiding grooming with them (Poirotte et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Poirotte et al. ). Mandrills ( Mandrillus sphinx ) are able to exclude conspecifics infected by endoparasites by avoiding grooming with them (Poirotte et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social interactions between individuals influence infectious disease dynamics at the population level (Aiello et al., ; Clay, Lehmer, Previtali, St. Jeor, & Dearing, ; Grear, Perkins, & Hudson, ), so understanding factors affecting these interactions and how they change in the presence of disease will facilitate more accurate predictions of how diseases spread (Aiello et al., ; Hawley, Etienne, Ezenwa, & Jolles, ; Lloyd‐Smith, Schreiber, Kopp, & Getz, ; Paull et al., ; VanderWaal & Ezenwa, ). Social animals associating with infected conspecifics likely increase their risk of infection, particularly with directly transmitted disease‐causing organisms, and there is evidence from multiple taxa that they avoid doing so (Behringer, Butler, & Shields, ; Croft et al., ; Goodall, ; Kavaliers, Fudge, Colwell, & Choleris, ; Kiesecker, Skelly, Beard, & Preisser, ; Poirotte et al., ; Schaller, ). For many animals, such “social barriers” to disease transmission may be as important as immunological or physical ones (Loehle, ; Schaller, ; Zylberberg, Klasing, & Hahn, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These protective responses in humans have been coined as the “behavioral immune system” and are associated with the elicitation of anticipatory neuroimmune responses, appropriate affective and cognitive responses, and relevant avoidance responses that may be the initial defense against pathogens. Similar aversive and avoidance responses to parasites and pathogens are evident in non‐human animals and have similarly been interpreted as reflecting disgust and perhaps a comparable behavioral immune system . Although not explicitly stated these aversive and avoidance may be considered in the context of a behavioral immune system.…”
Section: Social Cognition Disgust and Pathogen Avoidancementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Pathogen/parasite and infection avoidance behaviors of hosts can range from either directly avoiding or removing parasites or pathogen themselves, avoiding conspecifics with signs of infection or avoiding toxins and contaminated areas . Hosts can avoid interacting with individuals with whom they are likely to share parasites, especially if the conspecifics show signs of infection (eg, rats avoid interacting with bacterial treated conspecifics, primates avoid grooming group members infected by orofecally transmitted parasites). If hosts can detect infective and threatening parasites they can avoid them directly (eg, mice self‐bury to avoid biting and bot flies, cattle enter ponds to evade warble flies .…”
Section: Social Cognition Disgust and Pathogen Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation