2016
DOI: 10.2989/16085914.2016.1146122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mangrove reforestation: greening or grabbing coastal zones and deltas? Case studies in Senegal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the contribution of mangrove to people is well known and recognized [8,9],and while its drastic decline worldwide is undeniable, its current dynamic and the solutions recommended for its preservation are debatable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the contribution of mangrove to people is well known and recognized [8,9],and while its drastic decline worldwide is undeniable, its current dynamic and the solutions recommended for its preservation are debatable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But these approaches heighten the risk of conflict when they proscribe the access rights of traditional mangrove user groups. Such restrictions erode local support for conservation and can undermine policy application and goals (Beymer-Farris and Bassett 2012;Cormier-Salem and Panfili 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the establishment of MPAs has rapidly increased around the world to meet global targets, which has coincided with critical accounts and research documenting lack of inclusion, failure to consider local people's needs and livelihoods, dispossession of areas and resources, and even human rights issues in some initiatives [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Some authors and civil society organizations have gone so far as to question whether some MPAs are a form of "ocean grabbing" [26,[28][29][30][31], a term that refers to "the dispossession or appropriation of use, control or access to ocean space or resources from prior resource users, rights holders or inhabitants
through inappropriate governance processes and might employ acts that undermine human security or livelihoods or produce impacts that impair social-ecological well-being" [30]. Fisheries allocation decisions and management practices have often been critiqued as well, for failing to take into account the rights, needs and livelihoods of small-scale fishers and coastal communities [32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Exclusions and Injustices In Ocean Management And Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social blunders -i.e., lack of consideration or inclusion in decision-making and perceived or real inequities -may also undermine the ocean sustainability agenda. For example, ignoring the voices and concerns of local people and resource users can lead to local community opposition to or civil society backlash against marine protected areas [24,27,93], blue carbon initiatives [29], or sustainable blue economy developments [52]. The International Collective in Support of Fisherworkers (ICSF) and World Forum of Fisherpeople (WFF), for example, have been vocal in their opposition to mangrove conservation through Blue Carbon market investments and also to other forms of blue economy development.…”
Section: The Rationale For Just and Inclusive Ocean Governancementioning
confidence: 99%