2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-35713-9_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manifold Learning for Data-Driven Dynamical System Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our method reconciles approaches that rely purely on the temporal structure of the observations with those that approximate the invariant density and ignore the temporal order of measurements. With the recent development of the field of geometric statistics [50,51], and the surge of interest on the concept of manifold hypothesis [52,53], i.e., the consideration that often the state of multi-dimensional dynamical systems is confined on low dimensional regions of the state space, several inference methods have tried to merge geometric and temporal perspectives for identification of stochastic systems. In the Langevin regression framework [54], Callaham et al compute the Kramers-Moyal coefficients, and account for misestimation due to low sampling rate by solving the adjoint Fokker-Planck equation for the coefficients as proposed by Lade [55].…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method reconciles approaches that rely purely on the temporal structure of the observations with those that approximate the invariant density and ignore the temporal order of measurements. With the recent development of the field of geometric statistics [50,51], and the surge of interest on the concept of manifold hypothesis [52,53], i.e., the consideration that often the state of multi-dimensional dynamical systems is confined on low dimensional regions of the state space, several inference methods have tried to merge geometric and temporal perspectives for identification of stochastic systems. In the Langevin regression framework [54], Callaham et al compute the Kramers-Moyal coefficients, and account for misestimation due to low sampling rate by solving the adjoint Fokker-Planck equation for the coefficients as proposed by Lade [55].…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we should take into account not only the dynamics of the observed variables, but also its interaction with the unobserved variables. This assumption leads to a more complicated problem than (1) and in further section this problem is derived and discussed in detail.…”
Section: Mori-zwanzig Decomposition As a Nonlinear Extension Of Dynam...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We denote the result of such simulation as Measurement and plot it in Figure 1. Based on this simulation we construct matrices X + and X − from the DMD problem statement and solve problem (1). Then, we use the obtained operator A dmd to build the reconstructed dynamics according to (19), where the spectrum and eigenvectors of A dmd are used instead of averaged ones.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But it is hard to find the topology structure of the Bayesian network and calculate the transfer probability among nodes in the graphical model. The manifold learning models infer low-dimensional manifold of original data based on neighborhood information by non-parametric approaches [15,22]. The models own a solid theoretical basis, but the resolution process needs much time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%