2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b17339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manipulating Charge Transfer from Core to Shell in CdSe/CdS/Au Heterojunction Quantum Dots

Abstract: The photophysics of charge transfer and recombination mechanisms in a heterojunction structure of CdSe/CdS/Au quantum dots (QDs) are studied by temperature-dependent steady-state photoluminescence (PL) and time-resolved PL (TRPL). We manipulate the charge transfer from core to shell surface by varying the tunneling barrier height resulted from temperature variation, and the barrier width resulted from shell thickness variation. The charge transfer process, which can be described by a tunneling transmission mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By appropriately designing the QD–molecule or QD–cocatalyst interface, charge transfer at a subpicosecond level can be achieved, surpassing the ultrafast intraband cooling process (Figure a). However, the presence of defect states in QDs significantly affects interfacial charge transfer . These defect sites can either trap photogenerated charges from the bandgap or hot excitons, acting as charge transfer relays , or recombination centers, , leading to opposing directions of interfacial charge separation (see Figure b). QDs exhibit highly degenerate and quasi-discrete energy levels within a single unit, making them susceptible to multiexciton processes (Figure c) .…”
Section: Kinetic Process At the Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By appropriately designing the QD–molecule or QD–cocatalyst interface, charge transfer at a subpicosecond level can be achieved, surpassing the ultrafast intraband cooling process (Figure a). However, the presence of defect states in QDs significantly affects interfacial charge transfer . These defect sites can either trap photogenerated charges from the bandgap or hot excitons, acting as charge transfer relays , or recombination centers, , leading to opposing directions of interfacial charge separation (see Figure b). QDs exhibit highly degenerate and quasi-discrete energy levels within a single unit, making them susceptible to multiexciton processes (Figure c) .…”
Section: Kinetic Process At the Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exactly, the reduction potential (H + /H 2 ) and the oxidation potential (H 2 O/ O 2 ) of water are naturally sandwiched between the CBM and the VBM. The redox potential is related to the pH of water, and it has the following linear relationship: 57 E H+/H 2 = À4.44 eV + pH Â 0.059 eV (7) and…”
Section: The Electronic Properties and Heterostructure Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional semiconductor catalysts often have the disadvantages of low conductivity, a narrow visible light absorption range, and a high carrier recombination rate. [5][6][7] Compared with the photocatalysts of bulk semiconductor materials, two-dimensional (2D) semiconductors show a better performance because of their large specific surface areas, which can prolong the lifetime of photogenerated charges. However, photogenerated electrons and photogenerated holes may easily accumulate on the catalyst surface, which will interact and recombine with each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of surface passivation, which would reduce the surface-trapped state contribution, the use of plasmonic metal nanoparticles for PL enhancement is considered to increase the quantum yield considerably. Previous reports have documented the plasmonic effects on semiconductor QDs, [4,23,24,33] but the fractional contribution of temporal distributions and thermalization of the plasmon-coupled surface-trapped excitons has not been presented in full detail. Plasmonic NPs may reduce the nonradiative decay rate of semiconductor QDs when the plasmon-exciton coupling is much faster than the radiative and nonradiative decay of the QDs [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%