2014
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4015
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manipulating surface reactions in lithium–sulphur batteries using hybrid anode structures

Abstract: Lithium-sulphur batteries have high theoretical energy density and potentially low cost, but significant challenges such as severe capacity degradation prevent its widespread adoption. Here we report a new design of lithium-sulphur battery using electrically connected graphite and lithium metal as a hybrid anode to control undesirable surface reactions on lithium. Lithiated graphite placed in front of the lithium metal functions as an artificial, self-regulated solid electrolyte interface layer to actively con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
232
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 325 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
232
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of the aforementioned drawbacks result from the insulating nature of sulfur, dissolution of reaction intermediates (lithium polysulfides) and large volume variation between sulfur and sulfides during electrochemical reaction process [130]. To date, various approaches, such as developing new electrolytes [131][132][133], modifying the separator [134], protecting lithium anode [135], as well as designing new configuration [136,137], have been adopted to mitigate the 'shuttle effect' of polysulfides and prolong cyclic life. Particularly, to improve the practical lithium-sulfur performance, many efforts have been devoted to developing advanced sulfur cathodes, including adding advanced binder or hybridizing sulfur with conductive host to improve conductivity, modifying surface chemistry or introducing metal oxides with strong adsorption to retard the dissolution of polysulfides, inserting interlayer to manipulate the 'shuttle effects' of polysulfides or designing nanostructure (yolk-shell or hollow) to accommodate the volume change during electrochemical reaction process [138].…”
Section: Biomass-derived Carbon Materials For Lithium-sulfur Batterymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the aforementioned drawbacks result from the insulating nature of sulfur, dissolution of reaction intermediates (lithium polysulfides) and large volume variation between sulfur and sulfides during electrochemical reaction process [130]. To date, various approaches, such as developing new electrolytes [131][132][133], modifying the separator [134], protecting lithium anode [135], as well as designing new configuration [136,137], have been adopted to mitigate the 'shuttle effect' of polysulfides and prolong cyclic life. Particularly, to improve the practical lithium-sulfur performance, many efforts have been devoted to developing advanced sulfur cathodes, including adding advanced binder or hybridizing sulfur with conductive host to improve conductivity, modifying surface chemistry or introducing metal oxides with strong adsorption to retard the dissolution of polysulfides, inserting interlayer to manipulate the 'shuttle effects' of polysulfides or designing nanostructure (yolk-shell or hollow) to accommodate the volume change during electrochemical reaction process [138].…”
Section: Biomass-derived Carbon Materials For Lithium-sulfur Batterymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the above-mentioned obstacles, carbon based materials with various hierarchical structures, including meso-/micro-porous carbons [6][7][8][9][10][11] , hollow carbon spheres [12][13][14] , carbon nanotubes/nanofibers [15][16][17][18][19] , graphene derivatives [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] , and flexible carbon membranes 31 6 C with a low decay rate of 0.039% per cycle over 1500 cycles) 25 , a sulfur-graphene composite with ~ 63.6 wt% sulfur uniformly coated on graphene through reduction of GO and concomitant sulfurization (440 mAh g -1 after 500 cycles at 0.75 C) 22 , and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-encapsulated hollow S nanospheres (i.e., S@PVP nanospheres) from the reaction of Na2S2O3 and…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the ball-milling technique effectively combines both the physical and chemical routes into one-step process for low-cost, scalable, and eco-friendly production of highly-efficient LSB 11,25,28,37 attributable to its 3D porous 'sandwich-like' structure (vide infra), coupled with the newlydiscovered 'spin-effect' induced by S-doping, leading to enhanced ionic conductivity and lithium insertion/extraction during the discharge-charge process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the result of self‐discharge investigation, leaf‐like GO/S composites can largely limit the self‐discharge of Li–S battery. However, to further reduce the self‐discharge of Li–S batteries, a synergy of methods are still needed such as optimizing the electrolyte,7, 8 designing new battery structure,52, 53 protecting Li anode,54, 55 and spatially controlling sulphur species deposition 56. For comparison, conventional GO/S composite was synthesized and investigated as electrode for Li–S battery (Figure S9, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%