2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.92.012308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manipulating the Majorana qubit with Landau-Zener-Stückelberg interference

Abstract: Constructing a universal operation scheme for Majorana qubits remains a central issue for the topological quantum computation. We study the Landau-Zener-Stückelberg interference in a Majorana qubit and show that this interference can be used to achieve controllable operations. The Majorana qubit consists of an rf SQUID with a topological nanowire Josephson junction which hosts Majorana bound states. In the SQUID, a magnetic flux pulse can drive the quantum evolution of the Majorana qubit. The qubit experiences… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At sufficiently low temperatures, currents flowing into and from the nanowires are carried by Cooper pairs, which preserves the total parity of the system. Therefore, the low-energy physics is described by the following Hamiltonian 39 , 40 , with basis of the even- and odd-parity state , where τ x,z are Pauli matrices and is the phase difference between the two superconductors which can be driven dynamically by a bias voltage across the junction. The interaction term δ between the two parity states is determined by couplings between MQs in individual 1D topological superconductors by [ δ L between γ 1 and γ 2 and δ R between γ 3 and γ 4 as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At sufficiently low temperatures, currents flowing into and from the nanowires are carried by Cooper pairs, which preserves the total parity of the system. Therefore, the low-energy physics is described by the following Hamiltonian 39 , 40 , with basis of the even- and odd-parity state , where τ x,z are Pauli matrices and is the phase difference between the two superconductors which can be driven dynamically by a bias voltage across the junction. The interaction term δ between the two parity states is determined by couplings between MQs in individual 1D topological superconductors by [ δ L between γ 1 and γ 2 and δ R between γ 3 and γ 4 as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent experimental efforts are concentrated on studying dynamical properties such as electromagnetic radiation from the junction [14][15][16] . This Josephson radiation was predicted by standard resistively shunted junction model to have a series of spectra with frequencies f = neV /h 17,18 , where the first one f M = eV /h corresponds to the 4π-period Josephson effect and the second one f J = 2eV /h corresponds to conventional 2π-period Josephson effect 12,[19][20][21] . Several recent experiments successfully observed the 4π-period Josephson radiation with frequency f M , but its relation to the Majorana zero modes are still under debate because the signals lacks smoking gun features to be determined uniquely from Majorana zero modes 12,20,22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybridization of Majorana zero modes leads to a quantum two-level system 6 , with its Hamiltonian determined by the Josephson phase. We have included this Majorana two-level system into the standard theory, and built a quantum resistively and capacitively shunted junction model to study the dynamics of the topological Josephson junction 10,18,[23][24][25] . Inspired by recent experiments, we perform frequency analysis within this model and calculate the Josephson radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Weyl points in crystals require the breaking of scriptT or inversion symmetry, in four‐terminal junctions, the Weyl and nodal points may also occur under scriptT symmetry. [ 30–32 ] The importance of the Josephson junctions lies in the engineering of Andreev bound states (ABSs) and their control by building topological quantum‐computing architectures based on MBSs, [ 33–37 ] where superconducting phase difference, bias voltage, and magnetic flux play the role of control parameters. [ 38,39 ] To observe MBSs in 1D topological superconductors (TSCs), one of the most suggested models is based on quantum dots (QDs) because they are easily tunnelable objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%