Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is a highly contagious viral disease. Antibodies are pivotal in providing protection against FMDV infection. Serological protection against one FMDV serotype does not confer interserotype protection. However, some historical data have shown that interserotype protection can be induced following sequential FMDV challenge with multiple FMDV serotypes. In this study, we have investigated the kinetics of the FMDV-specific antibody-secreting cell (ASC) response following homologous and heterologous inactivated FMDV vaccination regimes. We have demonstrated that the kinetics of the B cell response are similar for all four FMDV serotypes tested following a homologous FMDV vaccination regime. When a heterologous vaccination regime was used with the sequential inoculation of three different inactivated FMDV serotypes (O, A, and Asia1 serotypes) a B cell response to FMDV SAT1 and serotype C was induced. The studies also revealed that the local lymphoid tissue had detectable FMDV-specific ASCs in the absence of circulating FMDV-specific ASCs, indicating the presence of short-lived ASCs, a hallmark of a T-independent 2 (TI-2) antigenic response to inactivated FMDV capsid.IMPORTANCE We have demonstrated the development of intraserotype response following a sequential vaccination regime of four different FMDV serotypes. We have found indication of short-lived ASCs in the local lymphoid tissue, further evidence of a TI-2 response to FMDV. KEYWORDS B cell, FMDV, T-independent, viral immunology F oot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is a highly contagious pathogen that has a large socioeconomic impact upon countries in which the virus is endemic. Studies of cattle and mice have shown that protection from the virus is largely mediated by antibodies (1). One of the main approaches to FMD control is through vaccination with inactivated FMDV antigen in formulation with adjuvants (2). However, the current inactivated FMDV vaccines are unable to induce long duration of immunity in cattle; regular repeated immunizations are required to maintain protective antibody titers (1).It is generally considered that serological protection against one FMDV serotype does not confer interserotype protection and may not, in some cases, confer intraserotype protection, given the antigenic variation seen within some serotypes (1). We have recently shown that intraserotype protection is possible within the FMDV O serotype using a heterologous FMDV challenge model following a single vaccination with inactivated FMDV (3). Indeed, Cottral and Gailiunas were able to demonstrate that after three rounds of challenge with multiple FMDV serotypes, the animals were resistant to further FMDV challenges (4). These animals had clearly developed cross-