Recent Developments in Ruminant Nutrition 1981
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-408-10804-1.50012-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manipulation of Rumen Fermentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The molar proportion of VFAs in all the supplemented diets were within levels recommended as adequate for cellulolytic bacteria: 65-74% acetic acid, 15-20% for propionic acid and 8-16% for butyric acid (Thomas and Rooke 1981). The proportion of acetic acid was high (0.73) in all the diets, indicating that forage quality was so low (Thomas and Rooke 1981) that a small proportion of energy was absorbed in the form of sugars by the animal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The molar proportion of VFAs in all the supplemented diets were within levels recommended as adequate for cellulolytic bacteria: 65-74% acetic acid, 15-20% for propionic acid and 8-16% for butyric acid (Thomas and Rooke 1981). The proportion of acetic acid was high (0.73) in all the diets, indicating that forage quality was so low (Thomas and Rooke 1981) that a small proportion of energy was absorbed in the form of sugars by the animal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The isobutyric and isovaleric acids, essential for some cellulolytic microbes, were increased by the legume supplementation of the veld hay, presumably through supplying amino acids, which were deaminated to provide the branched-chain skeletons for the VFAs (Ndlovu and Buchanan-Smith 1985). The molar proportion of VFAs in all the supplemented diets were within levels recommended as adequate for cellulolytic bacteria: 65-74% acetic acid, 15-20% for propionic acid and 8-16% for butyric acid (Thomas and Rooke 1981). The proportion of acetic acid was high (0.73) in all the diets, indicating that forage quality was so low (Thomas and Rooke 1981) that a small proportion of energy was absorbed in the form of sugars by the animal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%