2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.lmot.2011.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manipulations of start and food locations affect navigation on a foraging task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results suggest that such a strategy depends on the integrity of the DTN, as similar results were obtained with both electrolytic and neurotoxic lesions. Previous research has shown that rats trained to leave a variable start location to search for food often make errors on the return portion of the trip (Martin, Evans, Harley, & Skinner, 2005, Martin et al, 2011. The most common type of error was characterized as memory errors, or a return to a hole that was correct on a previous trial (Martin et al, 2011), indicative of learning and proactive interference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present results suggest that such a strategy depends on the integrity of the DTN, as similar results were obtained with both electrolytic and neurotoxic lesions. Previous research has shown that rats trained to leave a variable start location to search for food often make errors on the return portion of the trip (Martin, Evans, Harley, & Skinner, 2005, Martin et al, 2011. The most common type of error was characterized as memory errors, or a return to a hole that was correct on a previous trial (Martin et al, 2011), indicative of learning and proactive interference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has shown that rats trained to leave a variable start location to search for food often make errors on the return portion of the trip (Martin, Evans, Harley, & Skinner, 2005, Martin et al, 2011). The most common type of error was characterized as memory errors, or a return to a hole that was correct on a previous trial (Martin et al, 2011), indicative of learning and proactive interference. Control rats in the present study demonstrated this basic pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After locating food, the rats tended to return to the correct location for that trial or to one of the two holes that had afforded escape on previous trials. This result was not unexpected as rats make more proactive interference errors when variable start locations are used in combination with variable reward locations (Martin et al, 2011). Although accurate performance on this task could reflect the use of allothetic (e.g., visual) or idiothetic cues, the fact that all rats made a high number of memory errors suggests that they were using allothetic cues to orient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…First choice errors were divided into three types. Adjacent-hole errors occurred when a rat nose-poked the hole 45° to the left or right of its start hole; memory errors consisted of exploration of start holes (1, 3, or 5) from a previous trial; and other errors included visits to any other hole (Martin, Evans, Harley, & Skinner, 2005; Martin et al, 2011). Because the rats often made more than one error per trial, we also analyzed total errors by the two groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon completion of the water maze tasks in Experiment 1, the same rats were trained on a food foraging task. We have previously shown that when rats are trained to leave a variable start location in search of food they often make errors on the return to the start location (Dwyer et al, 2013; Martin, Evans, Harley, & Skinner, 2005; Martin et al, 2011). The most common type of error seen in control animals is memory errors, where subjects return to a hole that was correct on a previous trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%