2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2016.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manly transformation in finite mixture modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is substantially more excellent informative and more robust to response variable outliers than Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) for inference (Eide & Showalter, 1998;Levin, 2001). FMM, both fixed and varying weight parameter models, assume a linear relationship of the probability distributions, generally defined components (Park, Lord, & Wu, 2016;Zhu & Melnykov, 2018). With this feature, FMM has been used in many different areas before; the effect of job loss on drinking (Deb, Gallo, Ayyagari, Fletcher, & Sindelar, 2011), the analysis of medical data (Schlattmann, 2009), flow cytometry data (Pyne et al, 2009) and vehicle crash data (Park & Lord, 2009 (1)…”
Section: Instrument and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is substantially more excellent informative and more robust to response variable outliers than Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) for inference (Eide & Showalter, 1998;Levin, 2001). FMM, both fixed and varying weight parameter models, assume a linear relationship of the probability distributions, generally defined components (Park, Lord, & Wu, 2016;Zhu & Melnykov, 2018). With this feature, FMM has been used in many different areas before; the effect of job loss on drinking (Deb, Gallo, Ayyagari, Fletcher, & Sindelar, 2011), the analysis of medical data (Schlattmann, 2009), flow cytometry data (Pyne et al, 2009) and vehicle crash data (Park & Lord, 2009 (1)…”
Section: Instrument and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this can be very helpful for modelling purposes it can be misleading when dealing with clustering/classification applications as one cluster may be represented by more than one mixture component just because it has, in fact, a non‐elliptical distribution. A first possible route to continue to use our approach also in the presence of conditional non‐elliptical distributions for each cluster, consists in considering transformations so as to make the components as elliptical as possible (Schork & Schork, ; Zhu & Melnykov, ). Although such a treatment is very convenient to use the achievement of joint ellipticality is rarely satisfied and the transformed variables become more difficult to be interpreted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this can be very helpful for modeling purposes, it can be misleading when dealing with clustering/classification applications since one state may be represented by more than one mixture component just because it has, in fact, a non-elliptical distribution. A first possible route to continue to use our approach also in the presence of conditional non-elliptical distributions for each state, consists in considering transformations so as to make the components as elliptical as possible (Schork andSchork, 1988 andZhu andMelnykov, 2016). Although such a treatment is very convenient to use, the achievement of joint ellipticity is rarely satisfied and the transformed variables become more difficult to be interpreted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%