2012
DOI: 10.1159/000343145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mannheim Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Plaque Consensus (2004–2006–2011)

Abstract: Intima-media thickness (IMT) provides a surrogate end point of cardiovascular outcomes in clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of cardiovascular risk factor modification. Carotid artery plaque further adds to the cardiovascular risk assessment. It is defined as a focal structure that encroaches into the arterial lumen of at least 0.5 mm or 50% of the surrounding IMT value or demonstrates a thickness >1.5 mm as measured from the media-adventitia interface to the intima-lumen interface. The scientific basis f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
878
1
76

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,443 publications
(1,030 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
7
878
1
76
Order By: Relevance
“…IMT is considered a surrogate marker for atherosclerosis and a strong predictor of future cardiovascular events [29][30][31]. However, many methods are used to measure IMT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IMT is considered a surrogate marker for atherosclerosis and a strong predictor of future cardiovascular events [29][30][31]. However, many methods are used to measure IMT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying cause of these cardiovascular disease subgroups is atherosclerosis, a complex multifactorial disorder of the arteries initiated by endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and dyslipidemia 2, 3. Subclinical measures of atherosclerosis include common carotid artery intima‐media thickness (CCA‐IMT) and carotid atherosclerotic plaques, both of which have been shown to predict myocardial infarction and stroke 4, 5, 6…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure the left carotid, the participant turned on to the opposite side, and the process was repeated. Data were interpreted according to the Mannheim Consensus [51]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%