2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-4004.2003.44108.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mantle plumes: heat-flow near Iceland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the north of the Charlie Gibbs Fracture Zone, high thermal anomalies do appear around Iceland, but neither Iceland itself nor the proximal Jan Mayen microcontinent and the Iceland transverse ridge (including the Greenland‐Iceland and Iceland‐Faeroe ridges, abbreviated as GIR and IFR, respectively) are anomalously hot, especially on the Z b map estimated from EMAG2. This may explain why Iceland shows no evidence for significantly higher temperatures associated with a mantle plume [ Stein and Stein , ] and leaves further speculations on whether the Icelandic lithosphere is rather colder than hotter [ Menke and Levin , ; Menke et al ., ; Foulger et al ., ], and whether Iceland is associated with a geochemical or a thermal anomaly [ Anderson , ; Foulger , ]. There are also other uncertainties and difficulties in interpreting estimated bottom of magnetic sources beneath Iceland, arising from a deep Moho serving likely as a local magnetic boundary, and from possible changes in the fractal parameter, in the Curie temperature due to a geochemical anomaly, and/or in the magnetic data specifications.…”
Section: Estimating Curie‐point Depths Of North Atlanticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the north of the Charlie Gibbs Fracture Zone, high thermal anomalies do appear around Iceland, but neither Iceland itself nor the proximal Jan Mayen microcontinent and the Iceland transverse ridge (including the Greenland‐Iceland and Iceland‐Faeroe ridges, abbreviated as GIR and IFR, respectively) are anomalously hot, especially on the Z b map estimated from EMAG2. This may explain why Iceland shows no evidence for significantly higher temperatures associated with a mantle plume [ Stein and Stein , ] and leaves further speculations on whether the Icelandic lithosphere is rather colder than hotter [ Menke and Levin , ; Menke et al ., ; Foulger et al ., ], and whether Iceland is associated with a geochemical or a thermal anomaly [ Anderson , ; Foulger , ]. There are also other uncertainties and difficulties in interpreting estimated bottom of magnetic sources beneath Iceland, arising from a deep Moho serving likely as a local magnetic boundary, and from possible changes in the fractal parameter, in the Curie temperature due to a geochemical anomaly, and/or in the magnetic data specifications.…”
Section: Estimating Curie‐point Depths Of North Atlanticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now it is thought, however, that plumes sway in the mantle wind and need not be fixed (Steinberger and O'Connell, 1998). Many think of "hotspots"-locations of intraplate volcanism-as thermal plumes, but most hotspots are thought to be no hotter than average (Stein and Stein, 2003;DeLaughter et al, this volume;Green and Falloon, this volume). Several classic "plumes" show no evidence for an initial head phase (e.g., Hawaii) or a tail phase (e.g., Siberia, Ontong-Java), and several plume proponents now suggest that the classic model is too restrictive and that not all plumes need have heads or tails, and not all plumes need be deep-sourced (e.g., Cserepes and Yuen, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reconstructed subsidence histories of the rifted margins and the modeling of rare earth element data (Kerr, 1995) do seem to indicate a moderate thermal anomaly in the North Atlantic during breakup. However, modern heatflow (Stein and Stein, 2003), seismic and geochemical data (Foulger et al, this volume), as well as the subsidence evidence from the Iceland-Faeroe Ridge do not indicate a significant thermal anomaly under the area today.…”
Section: Temperature Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 88%