2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2018.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mantle transition zone beneath central-eastern Greenland: Possible evidence for a deep tectosphere from receiver functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar conclusion is obtained for Greenland by Kraft et al (2018). Arrival times of P660s and P410s modeconverted phases in P receiver functions (PRFs) were measured at 24 seismograph stations in central-eastern Greenland.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A similar conclusion is obtained for Greenland by Kraft et al (2018). Arrival times of P660s and P410s modeconverted phases in P receiver functions (PRFs) were measured at 24 seismograph stations in central-eastern Greenland.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The anomalies of the MTZ might preserve their position beneath the Siberian LIP in spite of the plate motion if they translated coherently with the Siberian plate. A similar conclusion is obtained for Greenland by Kraft et al (2018). Arrival times of P660s and P410s mode converted phases in P receiver functions (PRFs) were measured at 24 45 seismograph stations in central-eastern Greenland.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…The signal was explained as being generated at the top of a low‐velocity layer in the transition zone at a depth between 465 and 510 km. The reduction of the S wave velocity within this layer has been ascribed to an elevated temperature and reduced solidus temperature of mantle rocks (Kraft et al, , and references therein). Vinnik and Farra () attribute this velocity reduction to enhanced water content of wadsleite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A discontinuity at 520-km depth was first detected in some areas with SS precursors (e.g., Shearer, 1990) and with Pds phases (Chevrot et al, 1999), and explained as due to the β-spinel to γ-spinel phase transformation. The 520-km discontinuity has been also observed in hot spot regions and explained as the base of a lowvelocity layer in the mantle transition zone (Kraft et al, 2018;Vinnik et al, 2004;Vinnik et al, 2005;Vinnik et al, 2012) associated to melting in presence of high temperatures (Vinnik & Farra, 2006). Finally, a discontinuity at 630-km depth, associated to a seismic velocity reduction, was observed in several regions and interpreted as due to subducted oceanic crust above the 660-km discontinuity (e.g., Shen & Blum, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%