2006
DOI: 10.1144/gsl.sp.2006.259.01.06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mantle upwellings, melt migration and the rifting of Africa: insights from seismic anisotropy

Abstract: Abstract:The tiffing of continents and eventual formation of ocean basins is a fundamental component of plate tectonics, yet the mechanism for break-up is poorly understood. The East African Rift System (EARS) is an ideal place to study this process as it captures the initiation of a rift in the south through to incipient oceanic spreading in north-eastern Ethiopia. Measurements of seismic anisotropy can be used to test models of rifting. Here we summarize observations of anisotropy beneath the EARS from local… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
103
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
13
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At shallow depth (Figure 1, 100 km) and large depth (Figure 1, 310 km), the orientation of flow in the AfarEthiopia region is in agreement with SKS splitting measurements [Kendall et al, 2005]. In the uppermost mantle, this direction is primarily explained by oriented melt inclusions on mantle flow [Kendall et al, 2005[Kendall et al, , 2006, and at large depth, this direction reflects the average deep upper mantle flow. But the asthenospheric flow (Figure 1, 200 km) is strongly perturbed when it encounters the strong Afar plume (probably its head) and it seems to turn around it, This deflection is translated into an EW direction of anisotropy to [Dziewonski and Anderson, 1981] and plotted with the same color scale.…”
Section: Discussion: Geodynamical Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…At shallow depth (Figure 1, 100 km) and large depth (Figure 1, 310 km), the orientation of flow in the AfarEthiopia region is in agreement with SKS splitting measurements [Kendall et al, 2005]. In the uppermost mantle, this direction is primarily explained by oriented melt inclusions on mantle flow [Kendall et al, 2005[Kendall et al, , 2006, and at large depth, this direction reflects the average deep upper mantle flow. But the asthenospheric flow (Figure 1, 200 km) is strongly perturbed when it encounters the strong Afar plume (probably its head) and it seems to turn around it, This deflection is translated into an EW direction of anisotropy to [Dziewonski and Anderson, 1981] and plotted with the same color scale.…”
Section: Discussion: Geodynamical Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Sv and Sh velocity models determined from inversion of surface-wave dispersion curves show faster Sv velocities than Sh velocities below 20 km along the rift axis. The results are consistent with anisotropy at 20-75 km depth due to oriented melt-filled pockets [Kendall et al, 2005b]. Bastow et al [2005] show, by comparing P-and S-wave relative arrival-time data, that upper mantle low velocity anomalies beneath the MER are likely due to hightemperatures and partial melt.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Our study shows that melt-induced anisotropy at 20-75 km depth [Bastow et al, 2005;Kendall et al, 2005aKendall et al, , 2005b continues into the uppermost crust, thereby penetrating the entire plate and facilitating continental breakup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…NE of the TGD in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden rifts in Afar, Gao et al (2010) use the backazimuthal variations in SKS splitting to show rift parallel anisotropy throughout the lithosphere. They interpret this as strain related structures such as magmatic intrusions, a similar interpretation as by Kendall et al (2005Kendall et al ( , 2006 and Bastow et al (2010) in the MER. Below the lithosphere, anisotropic fast directions parallel the N30-40°E trend of the African Superplume and are most sensibly interpreted as related to alignment of olivine in the asthenosphere induced by subhorizontal flow (e.g., Bastow et al, 2010;Gao et al, 2010;Kendall et al, 2006;Obrebski et al, 2010).…”
Section: Evidence From Broadband Seismologymentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In the MER, high-density splitting analysis of SKS phases in tandem with surface-wave studies is sensitive to a~20°change in orientation of strain fabrics from N30-40°E at the rift margins to N10°E along the rift axis. This change is interpreted as caused by the localisation of magma intrusion through the whole lithosphere toward the rift axis~2 Ma (Bastow et al, 2010;Kendall et al, 2005Kendall et al, , 2006. NE of the TGD in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden rifts in Afar, Gao et al (2010) use the backazimuthal variations in SKS splitting to show rift parallel anisotropy throughout the lithosphere.…”
Section: Evidence From Broadband Seismologymentioning
confidence: 99%