2021
DOI: 10.3926/oss.407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manual avanzado de Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)

Abstract: Este libro es una traducción autorizada por Sage del libro Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Concebido como una ampliación del Manual de Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (segunda edición)*, esta guía práctica de fácil manejo abarca contenido avanzado de PLS-SEM para ayudar a los estudiantes e investigadores a aplicar técnicas sobre problemas de investigación y a interpretar oportunamente los resultados. El libro aporta un resumen de conceptos bá… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
416
1
22

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 398 publications
(451 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
416
1
22
Order By: Relevance
“…As suggested, this value for the study is above 0.5 for each construct (Fornell and Larcker, 1981). Also, the composite reliability (CR) of all constructs used in this study exceeds the recommended value of 0.7 (Hair et al, 2017). It shows how well a construct is measured by its assigned indicators (G€ otz et al, 2010).…”
Section: Instrument Validationfirst-order Constructs Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As suggested, this value for the study is above 0.5 for each construct (Fornell and Larcker, 1981). Also, the composite reliability (CR) of all constructs used in this study exceeds the recommended value of 0.7 (Hair et al, 2017). It shows how well a construct is measured by its assigned indicators (G€ otz et al, 2010).…”
Section: Instrument Validationfirst-order Constructs Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…As discussed above, the reflective-formative model was selected for this research, as the measures used to evaluate the first-order constructs are unidimensional, and the second-order construct has a formative measurement (Becker et al, 2012). Thus, we used a combination of approximations to both variable and model evaluation using a two-step method using a repeated indicator approach (Hair et al, 2017). As the first step, the variable evaluation, we used the repeated indicators approach (Duarte and Amaro, 2018).…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measurement models in this study contained first-order reflective models (constructs of AS, PS, SE and WB), a second-order reflective-formative model (construct of PsyCap) and a single-item measure (item AP). We followed "the rules of thumb" by Hair et al (2014Hair et al ( , 2018 when assessing the quality of the measurement and structural model results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the assessment of the second-order reflective-formative construct of PsyCap, we followed the guidelines of Becker et al (2015) and Hair et al (2018). A second-order reflective-formative construct means that the first-order constructs (hope, selfefficacy, resilience, optimism) are modeled as reflective, while the second-order construct (PsyCap) is modeled as formative.…”
Section: Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%