1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80014-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manual Muscle Strength Testing: Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliabilities for the Intrinsic Muscles of the Hand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strength testing included muscles that had a strong representation at each anatomical neurological level (Moore, 1985), and multiple muscles per myotome were included. Traditional motor grading (Daniels and Worthington, 1995;Brandsma et al, 1995) was employed for the strength testing. Prehension was included to represent the influence of sensation and strength on goal-oriented upper limb tasks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strength testing included muscles that had a strong representation at each anatomical neurological level (Moore, 1985), and multiple muscles per myotome were included. Traditional motor grading (Daniels and Worthington, 1995;Brandsma et al, 1995) was employed for the strength testing. Prehension was included to represent the influence of sensation and strength on goal-oriented upper limb tasks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manual muscle testing was scored based on the MRC scale, adapted for assess-ment of hand muscles. 17,18 The details of the RIHM and the measurement protocol have been described elsewhere. 13,15 In short, during the RIHM measurements, patients were asked to hold the finger or thumb in the instructed position while the force was slowly increased until the subject would not be able to maintain the same position (break test).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore we cannot provide the interobserver variability. However, the interobserver reliability of pinprick sensation was 81% [18] and 72% to 93% of the Lovett scale [4], according to previous studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%