Manufacturer performance modelling using system dynamics approach

Reddy, K. Jagan Mohan; Rao, Abhishek; Lanka, Krishnanand

doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.563

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recently, the system dynamics method has been implemented in many disciplines. It includes research in the agriculture system [37], Manufacture performance [38], supply chain management [39], agriculture modelling [40,41], container marine model [42], banking [43,44], port sustainability [45], health governance [46], environmental system [47], social development [48], software development [49], politics [50], public management [51], sustainable transportation [52,53], economic [54], defense system [55], risk management [56], production management [57], environmental social governance (ESG) [58] and Covid context [59,60].…”

Section: System Dynamics Modelingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The next step which includes feedback loops, whether reinforcing (positive) or balancing (negative), must be identified by examining interconnected causal relationships. Regarding physics comparison, negative and positive feedback loops are equivalent to stable and unstable equilibrium, respectively [38]. In this model, berthing time, idle time, and working time are dynamic variables and are represented by circles.…”

Section: Variables Of the Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Container Terminal Performance: System Dynamic Approach with Port Capacity Constraints and ESG Integration

2024

jjmie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Each container terminal has attempted to improve its performance through effective strategic and tactical management. Therefore, performance measurement is needed due to the long waiting time of the service process within container terminal operations. We have utilized the system dynamics methodology to assess container terminal performance. Container port enterprises have been influenced by governance, environmental and social components, therefore, the management of those components has significant impacts on the service port's performance. Therefore, the objective of the research is to model the dynamic performance of the container terminal with consideration of environmental, social, and governance components. Furthermore, this dynamic model has presented practical value for increasing the performance of the container terminal operation under capacity constraints. The case study focused on the Indonesia Port Corporation of Jakarta, Indonesia. As a result, the research has identified the influence of container terminal decision variables, such as emissions, employee satisfaction, and good corporate governance, on container terminals, implying their significance in reducing berthing time as the main indicator of container terminal performance. The novelty of this research is to provide a system dynamic model which combines tactical and strategic levels for container terminal operation.

show abstract

Section: System Dynamics Modelingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Variables Of the Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Container Terminal Performance: System Dynamic Approach with Port Capacity Constraints and ESG Integration

2024

jjmie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Performance metrics that can be implemented in an organization, such as quality, flexibility, cost, supplier reliability, innovation, responsiveness, order delivery lead time, final product delivery reliability, product variety, and asset management [9], are used to measure specific strategies of the firm, depending on the approach employed [34]. There are three types of approaches to SCPM: process-based approaches, perspective-based approaches, and hierarchy-based approaches [35].…”

Section: Measuring Sc Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Process-based approaches: SCM is the integration of processes and activities involved in transferring products and services from the supplier to the end customer. Many re-searchers have considered the key operational processes of the SC to develop performance measurement frameworks such as Six Sigma metrics [35,37], the four SC processes (plan, source, make, and deliver), and an integrated model to measure the three echelons (supplier, manufacturer, distributor). An internal process approach examines factors such as integration with SC partners, rework, supplier rejection rate, cash flow time, supplier lead time against industry norms, product development cycle time, and effectiveness of master production schedule [38].…”

Section: Cash-to-cash Cycle Time Inventory Days Of Supply Asset Turnsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Perspective-based approaches: There are six main perspectives for measuring SCM: system dynamics, operations research, logistics, marketing, organization, and strategy [9,35]. These approaches assemble generic performance measures and provide the interrelationship among the performance measures.…”

Section: Cash-to-cash Cycle Time Inventory Days Of Supply Asset Turnsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Measuring Supply Chain Performance for Khanh Hoa Sanest Soft Drink Joint Stock Company: An Application of the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Model

Nguyen,

Nguyen

et al. 2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As Khanh Hoa Sanest Soft Drink Joint Stock Company attempts to satisfy consumer requirements and maintain market share in the salangane nest industry, it is important to monitor the efficiency of its supply chain (SC). This paper identified metrics to evaluate the firm’s SC performance, using secondary data from firm records, primary data from a survey of 200 sales agents, and the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model. Production records revealed a manufacturing lead time of 11 days and a production time of 24 h plus 7 days for refrigeration and observation. Order fulfillment delivery times ranged from 13 to 16 days. About 86.0 percent of customers rated the product as good or very good, and 60.5 percent claimed benefits from consuming the product. SC management costs of goods sold were 75.27% of total costs, while production cost was 41.99% of total costs. Total assets increased 16.6% from 2019 to 2021, but profits declined by 32.9% for the same period, while return on assets fell 42.4%. To maintain a competitive advantage, the company should apply information technology to improve SC performance. The results showed that the SCOR model is appropriate for evaluating the performance of this firm and similar business enterprises.

show abstract

Manufacturer performance modelling using system dynamics approach

Cited by 2 publications

References 17 publications

Container Terminal Performance: System Dynamic Approach with Port Capacity Constraints and ESG Integration

Container Terminal Performance: System Dynamic Approach with Port Capacity Constraints and ESG Integration

Measuring Supply Chain Performance for Khanh Hoa Sanest Soft Drink Joint Stock Company: An Application of the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About