Manufacturing of a metallic 3D framework coated with a bioglass matrix for implant applications

Tabia, Zakaria; Bricha, Meriame; Mabrouk, Khalil El; Vaudreuil, Sébastien

doi:10.1007/s10853-020-05370-3

Cited by 16 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The peak at 1045 cm −1 could be due to stretching vibrations of Si− O−Si bonds in SiO 4 tetrahedrons. 45 Similarly, the peak observed at 604 cm −1 is associated with bending of the P−O bond of the PO 4 −3 tetrahedron. The peaks observed at 1447 and 1488 cm −1 are associated with the C−O bond stretching of CaCO 3 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Multifunctional 58S Bioactive Glass/Silver/Cerium Oxide-Based Biocomposites with Effective Antibacterial, Cytocompatibility, and Mechanical Properties

Singh,

Shakya,

Gupta

et al. 2024

ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

58S bioactive glass (BG) has effective biocompatibility and bioresorbable properties for bone tissue engineering; however, it has limitations regarding antibacterial, antioxidant, and mechanical properties. Therefore, we have developed BG AC biocomposites by reinforcing 58S BG with silver and ceria nanoparticles, which showed effective bactericidal properties by forming inhibited zones of 2.13 mm (against Escherichia coli) and 1.96 mm (against Staphylococcus aureus; evidenced by disc diffusion assay) and an increment in the antioxidant properties by 39.9%. Moreover, the elastic modulus, hardness, and fracture toughness were observed to be increased by ∼84.7% (∼51.9 GPa), ∼54.5% (∼3.4 GPa), and ∼160% (∼1.3 MPam 1/2 ), whereas the specific wear rate was decreased by ∼55.2% (∼1.9 × 10 −11 m 3 / Nm). X-ray diffraction, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, and field emission scanning electron microscopy confirmed the fabrication of biocomposites and the uniform distribution of the nanomaterials in the BG matrix. The addition of silver nanoparticles in the 58S BG matrix (in BG A ) increased mechanical properties by composite strengthening and bactericidal properties by damaging the cytoplasmic membrane of bacterial cells. The addition of nanoceria in 58S BG (BG C ) increased the antioxidant properties by 44.5% (as evidenced by the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl assay). The resazurin reduction assay and MTT assay confirmed the effective cytocompatibility for BG AC biocomposites against mouse embryonic fibroblast cells (NIH3T3) and mouse bone marrow stromal cells. Overall, BG AC resulted in mechanical properties comparable to those of cancellous bone, and its effective antibacterial and cytocompatibility properties make it a good candidate for bone healing.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Multifunctional 58S Bioactive Glass/Silver/Cerium Oxide-Based Biocomposites with Effective Antibacterial, Cytocompatibility, and Mechanical Properties

Singh,

Shakya,

Gupta

et al. 2024

ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Simultaneously, it was observed that because of the dissolution of bioglass, it behaves as a growth factor that sends signals to cells, allowing for better integration that is not seen when it comes to foreign materials due to a fibrous capsule surrounding the implant. In a review by Tabia et al (2021) , a 3D-printed lattice structure of a rhombic dodecahedron was formed. It was stated that this structure promotes reduction in stiffness and weight, and the addition of bioglass coating around this structure's framework promotes better bioactivity yielding to increase bone density and better bone remodeling, hence making it an excellent integration for hip implants.…”

Section: Surface Modification Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(C) Biphasic calcium phosphate(Ebrahimi et al, 2017;Behera et al, 2020). (D) Bioglass(Tabia et al, 2021).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Surface Treatment and Bioinspired Coating for 3D-Printed Implants

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has developed rapidly and demonstrates great potential in biomedical applications. Although 3D printing techniques have good control over the macrostructure of metallic implants, the surface properties have superior control over the tissue response. By focusing on the types of surface treatments, the osseointegration activity of the bone–implant interface is enhanced. Therefore, this review paper aims to discuss the surface functionalities of metallic implants regarding their physical structure, chemical composition, and biological reaction through surface treatment and bioactive coating. The perspective on the current challenges and future directions for development of surface treatment on 3D-printed implants is also presented.

show abstract

“…Using the methods described in this chapter, bioactive glass coatings were obtained on substrates of stainless steel [130][131][132][133][134][135][136], magnesium and its alloys [137][138][139][140], PET [141], titanium [36,[142][143][144], and alloys such as Ti-6Al-4V [145,146] and NiTi [147], silica [148], etc. These alloys possess a high strength, low elastic module, and good biocompatibility In the case of electrodeposition, the substrate must conduct electricity and its shape can be complex.…”

Section: Sol-gel Deposition Techniquementioning

confidence: 99%

Bioactive Glass—An Extensive Study of the Preparation and Coating Methods

Maximov

Crăciun

et al. 2021

Coatings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diseases or complications that are caused by bone tissue damage affect millions of patients every year. Orthopedic and dental implants have become important treatment options for replacing and repairing missing or damaged parts of bones and teeth. In order to use a material in the manufacture of implants, the material must meet several requirements, such as mechanical stability, elasticity, biocompatibility, hydrophilicity, corrosion resistance, and non-toxicity. In the 1970s, a biocompatible glassy material called bioactive glass was discovered. At a later time, several glass materials with similar properties were developed. This material has a big potential to be used in formulating medical devices, but its fragility is an important disadvantage. The use of bioactive glasses in the form of coatings on metal substrates allows the combination of the mechanical hardness of the metal and the biocompatibility of the bioactive glass. In this review, an extensive study of the literature was conducted regarding the preparation methods of bioactive glass and the different techniques of coating on various substrates, such as stainless steel, titanium, and their alloys. Furthermore, the main doping agents that can be used to impart special properties to the bioactive glass coatings are described.

show abstract

Manufacturing of a metallic 3D framework coated with a bioglass matrix for implant applications

Cited by 16 publications

References 60 publications

Multifunctional 58S Bioactive Glass/Silver/Cerium Oxide-Based Biocomposites with Effective Antibacterial, Cytocompatibility, and Mechanical Properties

Multifunctional 58S Bioactive Glass/Silver/Cerium Oxide-Based Biocomposites with Effective Antibacterial, Cytocompatibility, and Mechanical Properties

Surface Treatment and Bioinspired Coating for 3D-Printed Implants

Bioactive Glass—An Extensive Study of the Preparation and Coating Methods

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About