2002
DOI: 10.1111/1540-627x.00051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manufacturing Site Location Preferences of Small Agribusiness Firms

Abstract: This study examined the perceived importance of site location characteristics identified in a 1999 survey of 198 small Tennessee agribusinesses. Responding firms ranked proximity to buyers/customers, labor, and raw materials above other factors. However, the relative importance of all factors varied by industry subsector. For example, compared to food processing firms, textile milling and lumber/wood products firms perceived community incentives as less important. Projected firm growth and current location als… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have proposed that since firm clustering and its resultant knowledge spillover basically reflect positive public good nature (Appold 1995), governments should encourage the concentration of firms in geographic proximity through diverse public policy measures (e.g., subsidies, industrial zones, government-managed technical centers, and community incentive packages) in order to foster formal and informal contacts, business and non-business collaboration opportunities, and synergy effects among cluster participants (Appold 1995; Jensen and Pompelli 2002; Kim 2005; Van Dijk and Sverrisson 2003; Yamawaki 2002). However, based on a comprehensive literature review, the empirical results on the role of government policies affecting cluster formation are mixed, with no consensus (Holmes 1998).…”
Section: Extension Of the Basic Model: Government Subsidiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have proposed that since firm clustering and its resultant knowledge spillover basically reflect positive public good nature (Appold 1995), governments should encourage the concentration of firms in geographic proximity through diverse public policy measures (e.g., subsidies, industrial zones, government-managed technical centers, and community incentive packages) in order to foster formal and informal contacts, business and non-business collaboration opportunities, and synergy effects among cluster participants (Appold 1995; Jensen and Pompelli 2002; Kim 2005; Van Dijk and Sverrisson 2003; Yamawaki 2002). However, based on a comprehensive literature review, the empirical results on the role of government policies affecting cluster formation are mixed, with no consensus (Holmes 1998).…”
Section: Extension Of the Basic Model: Government Subsidiesmentioning
confidence: 99%