2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2012.07.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manufacturing Systems Complexity Review: Challenges and Outlook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is evidently shown in Figure 2 where these three components (product quality, on-time delivery and minimum cost) have the higher mean score compared to the others component measured. Manufacturing industries in pursuit of cost and time reduction without decreasing product quality [17,[19][20]. Improved product quality and on-time delivery result in improved performance [21].…”
Section: Measures Of Current Manufacturing Performance (Cmp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is evidently shown in Figure 2 where these three components (product quality, on-time delivery and minimum cost) have the higher mean score compared to the others component measured. Manufacturing industries in pursuit of cost and time reduction without decreasing product quality [17,[19][20]. Improved product quality and on-time delivery result in improved performance [21].…”
Section: Measures Of Current Manufacturing Performance (Cmp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These papers bring manifold topics and approaches, and show also more or less connections with inventory control theory, in general. Another field of applications is focused on system complexity analysis, where there is engineering design and manufacturing chains, see [18][19][20][21]. In general, the complexity of a system increases with the increasing level of disorder and uncertainty of its states, as presented in [22].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of inter-level relations may give the impression that the division of the energy efficiency study into these levels is not very useful. It is true, though, that an attempt for the simultaneous optimization of all the parameters involved, at all levels, presents very high complexity [32,34,35]. Even if such an approach is allowed by the current computational systems, the classification of the energy efficiency study into the four aforementioned levels significantly reduces the difficulty of the problem.…”
Section: Example 2 (Machine-production Line Inter-level Interaction)mentioning
confidence: 99%