2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.99.020202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Many-body localization as a large family of localized ground states

Abstract: Many-body localization (MBL) addresses the absence of thermalization in interacting quantum systems, with non-ergodic high-energy eigenstates behaving as ground states, only area-law entangled. However, computing highly excited many-body eigenstates using exact methods is very challenging. Instead, we show that one can address high-energy MBL physics using ground-state methods, which are much more amenable to many efficient algorithms. We find that a localized many-body ground state of a given interacting diso… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All eigenfunctions of (3.1) are localized for any h = 0. Using such localized eigenstates |Ψ loc as an input states yield a vanishing variance e 3 when L → +∞, a feature already observed for the zerotemperature interacting Bose-glass problem [5]. Therefore, we expect |Ψ loc to be a fairly good approximant of an eigenstate of the associated parent Hamiltonian H P , encoded in the corresponding eigenvector x 3 of C. This becomes increasingly true for growing disorder strength and system size.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All eigenfunctions of (3.1) are localized for any h = 0. Using such localized eigenstates |Ψ loc as an input states yield a vanishing variance e 3 when L → +∞, a feature already observed for the zerotemperature interacting Bose-glass problem [5]. Therefore, we expect |Ψ loc to be a fairly good approximant of an eigenstate of the associated parent Hamiltonian H P , encoded in the corresponding eigenvector x 3 of C. This becomes increasingly true for growing disorder strength and system size.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 56%
“…h 1 2 3 4 5 α =0 2.05(1) 2.47(1) 3.10(1) 3.56(1) 3.88(1) α =0. 5 2.05(1) 2.24(1) 2.61(1) 2.93(1) 3.20 (1) TABLE I. Decay exponent α(h) of the third eigenvalue e3 of the covariance matrix, as defined in Eq.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the standard Heisenberg model with RD, the probability distribution P(s z ) for site-resolved spin expectation values s z l = Ŝz l for mid-energy eigenstates ( ≈ 0.5) has a U-shape with peaks at s z ±0.5 in the MBL phase due to the presence of local integrals of motion that have substantial overlaps with Ŝz l operators [61,[88][89][90][91]. According to the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, P(s z ) has a Gaussian distribution with a peak at s z = 0 and variance that quickly decreases with L deep in the ergodic regime.…”
Section: Model and Observablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having characterized our zero-temperature phase transition, and in view of the recent evidence that localized ground states correspond to many-body localized excited eigenstates of related Hamiltonians 42 , we hope our model may be useful to shed light on the nature of the many-body localization transition, which remains largely unclear 4,5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%