2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Many Happy Returns: Combining insights from the environmental and behavioural sciences to understand what is required to make reusable packaging mainstream

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recycling is thus never 100% efficient and higher value retention options are therefore preferred from a sustainability standpoint as they increase the lifespan of plastic products (R2-R6) or reduce the need to produce plastics in the first place (R0-R2). In fact, research has found that re-usable packaging, such as returnable bottles, have significantly lower ecological footprints than single-use plastics [91][92][93].…”
Section: R9mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recycling is thus never 100% efficient and higher value retention options are therefore preferred from a sustainability standpoint as they increase the lifespan of plastic products (R2-R6) or reduce the need to produce plastics in the first place (R0-R2). In fact, research has found that re-usable packaging, such as returnable bottles, have significantly lower ecological footprints than single-use plastics [91][92][93].…”
Section: R9mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, recycling (R7) remains the core CE value retention strategy in Dutch policies and the only one with mandatory targets. Yet, recycling has clear limitations and cannot by itself lead to a sustainable circular plastic economy without strong policy measures and targets on higher value retention options such as reducing virgin plastic consumption (R0 refuse), eco-design requirements to reduce the environmental impact of plastics (R1 reduce), and the promotion of re-usable packaging (R2 reuse) [25,86,92].…”
Section: Analysis Of Dutch Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five studies in this review were not included in the quantitative reuse meta-analysis; two had no single-use baseline and three had no absolute impact data but provided their own break-even points. For Climate Change impacts, these were 4 times for reusable plastic cutlery ( 67 ), 2-4 times for takeaway food containers ( 68 ), <3-7 times for drinks cups ( 70 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reusable products were compared to single use products in 17 LCAs (21,25,28,30,35,41,43,(56)(57)(58)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69)(70). Studies comparing packaging designed to be reused with packaging designed for single use, based on both products being used just once (n=6 studies; 32 comparison points) demonstrated almost universal and often large relative increases in all health-related impacts for reusable packaging (Figure S4).…”
Section: Health Effects Of Reusable Plastic Packagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding sustainable packaging, some academics, adopting a micro perspective, focus on sustainable materials (e.g. Wu et al, 2021), technologies to trace reusable packaging such as digital passports within value chains (Ellsworth-Krebs et al 2022), environmental packaging design with regard to consumers (Yokokawa, et al, 2021), combined perspectives for sustainable package design (Svanes et al, 2010), and reusable packaging systems (Greenwood et al, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Review Sustainable Packaging and Green Supply Cha...mentioning
confidence: 99%