2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/smc.2019.8914005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm Based On Decomposition With Random And Adaptive Weights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a representative MOEA/D variant with an adaptive weight adjustment, MOEA/D-AWA periodically deletes weight vectors from the overly crowded regions and it adds new ones at the sparse areas guided by the external archive [42]. To improve the performance of MOEA/D-AWA for many-objective optimization problems, some variants have been proposed to use a uniformly random method to generate the initial weight vectors [43,44]; or emphasize more on promising yet under-exploited areas [45,75]; or enhance denser alternative weight vectors close to the valid weight vectors [46][47][48].…”
Section: Delete-and-add Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a representative MOEA/D variant with an adaptive weight adjustment, MOEA/D-AWA periodically deletes weight vectors from the overly crowded regions and it adds new ones at the sparse areas guided by the external archive [42]. To improve the performance of MOEA/D-AWA for many-objective optimization problems, some variants have been proposed to use a uniformly random method to generate the initial weight vectors [43,44]; or emphasize more on promising yet under-exploited areas [45,75]; or enhance denser alternative weight vectors close to the valid weight vectors [46][47][48].…”
Section: Delete-and-add Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model-based adaptation methods T-MOEA/D [33], paλ-MOEA/D [34], apa-MOEA/D [35], DMOEA/D [36] Polynomial model MOEA/D-LTD [37,38] Parametric model MOEA/D-SOM [39], MOEA/D-GNG [40,41] Neural networks Delete-and-add MOEA/D-AWA [42], MOEA/D-URAW [43,44], AdaW [45] Less crowded or promising areas CLIA [46], MOEA/D-AM2M [47,48] RVEA* [49], [50], iRVEA [51], OD-RVEA [52], EARPEA [53], g-DBEA [54] Away from the promising areas A-NSGA-III [55], A 2 -NSGA-III [56], AMOEA/D [57], MOEA/D-TPN [58],…”
Section: Subcategory Algorithm Name Core Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we start by analyzing the performance of the several algorithms for the trajectory optimization of a point-point motion, including the proposed INSGA-II, MO-INSGA-II [34], success history-based adaptive multi-objective differential evolution with whale optimization (SHAMODE-WO) [35], IMOPSO [36], many-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition with random and adaptive weights (MOEA/ D-URAW) [37] and IMODE [38]. In a second phase, the composite polynomial with the quintic B-splines approach are compared to evaluate its effectiveness.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of conducting simulation is to verify the search capability and convergence speed of the proposed INSGA-II as well as validity and competency of the composite polynomial approach for creating trajectory. In this section, taking a serial-parallel hybrid manipulator as instance [33], we start by analyzing the performance of the proposed INSGA-II, MO-INSGA-II [34], success historybased adaptive multi-objective differential evolution with whale optimization (SHAMODE-WO) [35], IMOPSO [36], many-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition with random and adaptive weights (MOEA/D-URAW) [37] and IMODE [38] for the trajectory optimization of a point-point motion. In a second phase, we compared the composite polynomial with the quintic B-splines approach to evaluate its effectiveness.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%