Many-Objective Optimization of Sustainable Drainage Systems in Urban Areas with Different Surface Slopes

Abstract

Sustainable urban drainage systems are multi-functional nature-based solutions that can facilitate flood management in urban catchments while improving stormwater runoff quality. Traditionally, the evaluation of the performance of sustainable drainage infrastructure has been limited to a narrow set of design objectives to simplify their implementation and decision-making process. In this study, the spatial design of sustainable urban drainage systems is optimized considering five objective functions, including minimization of flood volume, flood duration, average peak runoff, total suspended solids, and capital cost. This allows selecting an ensemble of admissible portfolios that best trade-off capital costs and the other important urban drainage services. The impact of the average surface slope of the urban catchment on the optimal design solutions is discussed in terms of spatial distribution of sustainable drainage types. Results show that different subcatchment slopes result in non-uniform distributional designs of sustainable urban drainage systems, with higher capital costs and larger surface areas of green assets associated with steeper slopes. This has two implications. First, urban areas with different surface slopes should not have a one-size-fits-all design policy. Second, spatial equality must be taken into account when applying optimization models to urban subcatchments with different surface slopes to avoid unequal distribution of environmental and human health co-benefits associated with green drainage infrastructure.

How spatial policies can leverage energy transitions − Finding Pareto-optimal solutions for wind turbine locations with evolutionary multi-objective optimization

“…Third, in this study, we included three objectives which we deem highly relevant when identifying optimal solutions for WT allocation. Nevertheless, as in many infrastructure planning problems, it could be important to include more objectives (Seyedashraf et al, 2021). The NSGA-III algorithm has been shown to perform well for several many-objective optimization problems (Deb and Jain, 2014) and would allow to include more objectives.…”

Disambiguating Concepts of Fairness in Stormwater Management: A Review of Economic Efficiency and Equity

“…Similarly, Meerow (2019) developed a web-based green infrastructure planning tool for New York City, Los Angeles, and Manila that identifies hotspots for multiple desired benefits beyond SWM. In fact, Seyedashraf et al (2021) show that, regardless of the underlying social conditions, onesize-fits-all stormwater policies or objectives can themselves lead to distributional inequity.…”

The Rain-induced Urban Waterlogging Risk and its Evaluation: A Case Study in the Central City of Shanghai

“…In other words, we especially look at the four categories of waterlogging risk so as to examine the direct risk caused by heavy rain. Researches show that the simulation of the drainage pipe network system is crucial for urban waterlogging [36,37]. The water flow conditions of drainage pipes are complex, with circulation, reflux, pressure flow and so on under cement, asphalt surface, dense high buildings and large impervious area, so urban hydrological characteristics are not obvious [38].…”