2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13717-014-0027-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Many public urban parks, but who profits from them? The example of Tabriz, Iran

Abstract: Introduction: Public urban parks are accessible to everyone in a city. The time people need to reach a public park influences the accessibility of the park. Parks far away from home are less accessible because of time to spend to reach them than those in the neighborhood. Good green urban infrastructure aims to provide different types of parks (by size and structure) to all urban dwellers. The network of parks should allow all inhabitants to have access to parks within close proximity to their residences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parallel to the increasing population of cities worldwide and anxiety due to the life quality of residents, a general interest in potential and real benefits derived from the city's green infrastructure has arisen [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. These benefits are classified as ecosystem services (ES) [10], the most important in urban areas being the cultural ES which are essential for the well-being and health of the citizens [11][12][13][14][15][16], while at the same time being commonly underestimated due to difficulties in quantification [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parallel to the increasing population of cities worldwide and anxiety due to the life quality of residents, a general interest in potential and real benefits derived from the city's green infrastructure has arisen [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. These benefits are classified as ecosystem services (ES) [10], the most important in urban areas being the cultural ES which are essential for the well-being and health of the citizens [11][12][13][14][15][16], while at the same time being commonly underestimated due to difficulties in quantification [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars suggest that the urban planning, development, and management improve the quality of life through urban development projects, i.e. electronic cities (Zarabi et al, 2015), water supply and distribution (Yu, 2012) and (Shahraki, 2015), declining inhabitants' social anxieties (Breuste & Rahimi, 2015), lessening urban economic problems (Maghsoodi and Hedayati, 2015), improving residential situations (Behrad & Bahrami, 2015), increasing people's access to urban infrastructures (Taghvaei, Moharamzadeh, khan Aghai, & Asl, 2015) and ending the current environmental degradation (Hardoy & Satterthwaite, 2014). In return expecting a better life quality causes better urban planning, design and management outcomes (Lau, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundation For the Life Quality-oriented Urban Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parallel to the increasing population of cities worldwide and anxiety due to the life quality of residents, a general interest in potential and real benefits derived from the city's green infrastructure has arisen [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. These benefits are classified as ecosystem services [10], the most important in urban areas being the cultural ES which are essential for the well-being and health of the citizens, [11][12][13][14][15][16], while being at the same time commonly underestimated due to difficulties in quantification [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%