2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-93802-6_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Many-Valuation, Modality, and Fuzziness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that and ♦ are mutually dual, that is, A ≡ ¬♦¬A and ♦A ≡ ¬ ¬A for all formulas A, where A ≡ B means that the formulas A and B are semantically equivalent, that is, v(A) = v(B) for all valuations v. A complete analysis of 3-valued valuations and evaluation rules in L 3 is given, e.g., in Mattila [13]. Alfred Tarski, being at that time Lukasiewicz' assistant, found out that the formula ¬A → A (1.1) has exactly the same truth table as the formula ♦A.…”
Section: As a Modal Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that and ♦ are mutually dual, that is, A ≡ ¬♦¬A and ♦A ≡ ¬ ¬A for all formulas A, where A ≡ B means that the formulas A and B are semantically equivalent, that is, v(A) = v(B) for all valuations v. A complete analysis of 3-valued valuations and evaluation rules in L 3 is given, e.g., in Mattila [13]. Alfred Tarski, being at that time Lukasiewicz' assistant, found out that the formula ¬A → A (1.1) has exactly the same truth table as the formula ♦A.…”
Section: As a Modal Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of these logics are Kleene's logic and Łukasiewicz logic. Some analysis about Łukasiewicz and Kleene's logic is given for example in Mattila (Mattila, 2009). Especially, connections to modal logic are considered in that paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%