MAOA, Childhood Maltreatment, and Antisocial Behavior: Meta-analysis of a Gene-Environment Interaction

Abstract

Background In a seminal study of gene-environment interaction, childhood maltreatment predicted antisocial behavior more strongly in males carrying an MAOA promoter variant of lesser, compared to higher, transcriptional efficiency. Many further investigations have been reported, including studies of other early environmental exposures and females. Here we report a meta-analysis of studies testing the interaction of MAOA genotype and childhood adversities on antisocial outcomes in predominantly non-clinical samples. Method Included were 27 peer-reviewed, English-language studies published through August, 2012, that contained indicators of maltreatment or “other” family (e.g., parenting, sociodemographic) hardships; MAOA genotype; indices of aggressive and antisocial behavior; and statistical test of genotype-environment interaction. Studies of forensic and exclusively clinical samples, clinical cohorts lacking proportionally matched controls, or outcomes non-specific for antisocial behavior were excluded. The Liptak-Stouffer weighted Z-test for meta-analysis was implemented to maximize study inclusion and calculated separately for male and female cohorts. Results Across 20 male cohorts, early adversity presaged antisocial outcomes more strongly for low, relative to high, activity MAOA genotype (P=.0044). Stratified analyses showed the interaction specific to maltreatment (P=.0000008) and robust to several sensitivity analyses. Across 11 female cohorts, MAOA did not interact with combined early life adversities, whereas maltreatment alone predicted antisocial behaviors preferentially, but weakly, in females of high activity MAOA genotype (P=.02). Conclusions We found common regulatory variation in MAOA to moderate effects of childhood maltreatment on male antisocial behaviors, confirming a sentinel finding in research on gene-environment interaction. An analogous, but less consistent, finding in females warrants further investigation.

The Genomic Architecture of Interactions Between Natural Genetic Polymorphisms and Environments in Yeast Growth

“…G3E is believed to be ubiquitous among all organisms, and has long been studied in domestic animals and plants, genetic model organisms, and humans. In humans, G3E has been implicated in cancer (Thorgeirsson et al 2008), inflammatory disorder (Chamaillard et al 2003), immune system diseases (Padyukov et al 2004), and mental disorders (Risch et al 2009;Byrd and Manuck 2014;Luck et al 2014). Investigating G3E can help identify the causal pathways of a trait (Gagneur et al 2013), dissect genetic tradeoffs (Qian et al 2012), understand environmental adaptations (Ostrowski et al 2005), and reveal a potential cause of "missing heritability" (Manolio et al 2009;Eichler et al 2010).…”

“…Many recent forward genetic studies of G3E in humans are driven by the idea of personalized medicine, and focus on finding candidate genes and environmental factors that interact in influencing disease, drug response, or behavior (Caspi et al 2002Hood et al 2004;Kendler et al 2012;Byrd and Manuck 2014;Luck et al 2014). Although a number of genes have been reported to interact with environmental factors, the reproducibility of these genome-wide association study (GWAS) results tends to be low (Hunter 2005;Duncan and Keller 2011), and one likely reason is that environmental factors are hard to control in human studies.…”

The developmental origins of chronic physical aggression: biological pathways triggered by early life adversity

“…Following this publication, a number of independent studies have tried to replicate the results and reported mixed findings. In contrast, meta-analyses grouping most of these studies were able to confirm a significant MAOA×child abuse interaction that predicts antisocial behaviour in men, whereas these results turned out to be less consistent in women and this requires further investigation (Byrd and Manuck, 2014;Kim-Cohen et al, 2006;Taylor and Kim-Cohen, 2007).…”

Genetic and Neuroimaging Features of Personality Disorders: State of the Art

“…Meanwhile, a gene 9 environment interaction effect of low-activity MAOA and maltreatment on antisocial behavior has also been widely reported [72][73][74][75][76]. However, investigators such as Ficks and Waldman [65] have criticized findings of this kind, stating that many findings are still fraught with methodological and interpretive flaws.…”