Map acquisition and classification of haptic interaction using cross correlation between distributed tactile sensors on the whole body surface

Noda, Tomoyuki; Miyashita, Takahiro; Ishiguro, Hiroshi; Hagita, Norihiro

doi:10.1109/iros.2007.4399573

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In 7.4% of papers (n = 4), authors described employing the Oz with Wizard model, a robot-centric method where users are involved in a WoZ experiment but not precisely measured. For example, Noda et al (2007) describe an experiment testing a haptic interaction classification method at the Osaka Science Museum, allowing participants to freely interact with their robot. The participants themselves are not measured, but how robot classifies their actions is.…”

Section: Steinfeld Et Al (2009) Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Wizard of Oz Studies in HRI: A Systematic Review and New Reporting Guidelines

Riek

2012

JHRI

547

206

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many researchers use Wizard of Oz (WoZ) as an experimental technique, but there are methodological concerns over its use, and no comprehensive criteria on how to best employ it. We systematically review 54 WoZ experiments published in the primary HRI publication venues from 2001-2011. Using criteria proposed by Fraser and Gilbert (1991), Green et al. (2004), Steinfeld et al. (2009), and Kelley (1984), we analyzed how researchers conducted HRI WoZ experiments. Researchers mainly used WoZ for verbal (72.2%) and non-verbal (48.1%) processing. Most constrained wizard production (90.7%), but few constrained wizard recognition (11%). Few reported measuring wizard error (3.7%), and few reported pre-experiment wizard training (5.4%). Few reported using WoZ in an iterative manner (24.1%). Based on these results we propose new reporting guidelines to aid future research.

show abstract

Section: Steinfeld Et Al (2009) Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%