2010
DOI: 10.4161/fly.4.3.12001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MAP kinase phosphorylation is dispensable for cell division, but required for cell growth in Drosophila

Abstract: Proper activation of the Ras/MAPK pathway is broadly required during development, and in many cases, signal transduction downstream of the receptor is linear. Thus, different mechanisms exist to properly regulate the large number of specific developmental outputs that are required by the activation of this pathway. Previously, we have reported a regulated cytoplasmic sequestration of phosphorylated MAPK (pMAPK) in developing Drosophila compound eyes and wings “called MAPK Cytoplasmic Hold”. In the developing w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig 1F, the double ortholog mutants mkp2 × mkp3 and mkp3 × mkp5 do not respond to BCI with an increase in pMAPK expression unlike mkp2 × mkp5 and the ortholog single mutants. It has previously been shown that although pMAPK is not necessary for cell division in Drosophila, it is required for cell growth (Majumdar et al, 2010). Without this signal being generated, these cells may be stuck in cell division, which does not allow for ciliogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fig 1F, the double ortholog mutants mkp2 × mkp3 and mkp3 × mkp5 do not respond to BCI with an increase in pMAPK expression unlike mkp2 × mkp5 and the ortholog single mutants. It has previously been shown that although pMAPK is not necessary for cell division in Drosophila, it is required for cell growth (Majumdar et al, 2010). Without this signal being generated, these cells may be stuck in cell division, which does not allow for ciliogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%