Map of quasicomponents induced by a shape morphism

Self Cite

In this paper we present the intrinsic approach to shape based on proximate sequences and nets of functions, and establish equivalence of different definitions. At the end are presented the results obtained recently, by use of the intrinsic approach to shape. The notion of shape was introduced by K. Borsuk in 1968 as a new classifcation of spaces from the point of view of their most important global topological properties. Main references about shape are the books of Borsuk [5] and of Mardesic and Segal [13] The approaches in both books are using external elements for describing shape of a space: neighborhoods in some external space where the original space is embedded, or an inverse sequence (system) of ANRs or polyhedra.On the other hand there exists an internal characterization of shape, an approach without external spaces. In this intrinsic approach to shape there are two main branches: 1) approach by proximate sequences and proximate nets 2) approach by multivalued functions.About the second approach we refer to articles: [7], [10], [11], [20] and [21]. The subject of this paper is the intrinsic approach by proximate sequences and nets, and the results obtained by this approach. More detailed explanation of the papers connected with this approach is presented in Sections 2 and 3. Intrinsic approach to shape by proximate sequences and netsThe idea of ε -continuity (continuity up to ε > 0) leads to continuity up to some covering V i.e., Vcontinuity, and the corresponding V -homotopy. Here, will be presented a short description of the intrinsic approach presented in [27] and [28]. Let X, Y be topological spaces. For collections U and V of subsets of X, U ≺ V means that U refines V, i.e., each U ∈ U is contained in some V ∈ V.By a covering we understand a covering consisting of open sets.A function is V -continuous, if it is V -continuous at every point x ∈ X . In this case, the family of all U x form a covering of X . By this, f : X → Y is V -continuous if there exists a covering U of X, such that for any x ∈ X,

Section: Results Using Intrinsic Shapementioning

confidence: 99%

“…">Intrinsic approach to shape by proximate sequences and netsThe idea of ε -continuity (continuity up to ε > 0) leads to continuity up to some covering V i.e., Vcontinuity, and the corresponding V -homotopy. Here, will be presented a short description of the intrinsic approach presented in [27] and [28]. Let X, Y be topological spaces.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Intrinsic shape - the proximate approach

Shekutkovski

2015

Self Cite

“…The following lemma is also from [11]: Since shape equivalence preserves connected components(see [7] and [15]) we obtain a contradiction.…”

Section: Conley Index and Shape Of Attractorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Characterization of topologically transitive attractors for analytic plane flows

Shoptrajanov

Shekutkovski

2015

Self Cite

“…In [9] quasicomponents are defined in terms of continuous functions. Let X be a topological space and let {0, 1} be two element space with discrete topology.…”

Section: Product Of Quasicomponentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For more details about quasicomponents, quasicompactification, space of quasicomponents, see [1,[3][4][5][7][8][9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

On product of spaces of quasicomponents

Markoski

Buklla

2017

Self Cite

We use a characterization of quasicomponents by continuous functions to obtain the well known theorem which states that product of quasicomponents Q x , Q y of topological spaces X, Y, respectively, gives quasicomponent in the product space X×Y. If spaces X, Y are locally-compact, paracompact and Haussdorf, then we prove that the space of quasicomponents of the product Q(X×Y) is homeomorphic with the product space Q(X) × Q(Y), so these two spaces have the same topological properties.