2006 Fortieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers 2006
DOI: 10.1109/acssc.2006.354988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MAP Source Separation using Belief Propagation Networks

Abstract: In this paper we continue our treatment of source separation based on dynamic sparse source signal models. Source signals are modeled in frequency domain as a product of a Bernoulli selection variable with a deterministic but unknown spectral amplitude variable. The Bernoulli variable is modeled by a first order Markov process with transition probabilities learned from a training database. We consider a scenario where the mixing parameters are estimated by calibration. We derive the MAP signal estimators and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past series of papers [2][3][4][5][6][7] the authors studied (1), and several generalizations of this model in the following respects. Mixing model: each channel may have an attenuation factor (equivalently, τ l may be complex); Noise statistics: noise signals may have inter-sensor correlations; Signals: more signals may non-vanish at each time-frequency point (maximum number allowed is D − 1); more recently we have considered temporal, and time-frequency, dependencies on signal statistics.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past series of papers [2][3][4][5][6][7] the authors studied (1), and several generalizations of this model in the following respects. Mixing model: each channel may have an attenuation factor (equivalently, τ l may be complex); Noise statistics: noise signals may have inter-sensor correlations; Signals: more signals may non-vanish at each time-frequency point (maximum number allowed is D − 1); more recently we have considered temporal, and time-frequency, dependencies on signal statistics.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%