2021
DOI: 10.24875/rma.21000008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapeo ultrasonográfico preoperatorio para optimizar tiempo de maduración de fístulas arteriovenosas

Abstract: La fístula arteriovenosa autóloga (FAV) es la mejor modalidad de acceso vascular para hemodiálisis por su permeabilidad primaria a largo plazo. Objetivo: Evaluar el mapeo ultrasonográfico preoperatorio y determinar si realizar este ayuda a disminuir el tiempo de maduración, comparado con aquellos a los que no se les realiza. Material y métodos: Se efectúo un estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo y analítico de los pacientes con fístula sin que se hiciera mapeo ultrasonográfico previo con aquellos pacientes que se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the removal of duplicates, 3418 articles were screened for eligibility and 24 of them were retrieved in fulltext form. Subsequently, 6 studies were excluded due to the following reasons: different population (n = 1) [17], different intervention (n = 1) [18], different comparison (n = 1) [19], different outcome of interest (n = 2) [20,21] and unclear data presentation (n = 1) [22]. As a result, a total of 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 3,655 participants [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the removal of duplicates, 3418 articles were screened for eligibility and 24 of them were retrieved in fulltext form. Subsequently, 6 studies were excluded due to the following reasons: different population (n = 1) [17], different intervention (n = 1) [18], different comparison (n = 1) [19], different outcome of interest (n = 2) [20,21] and unclear data presentation (n = 1) [22]. As a result, a total of 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 3,655 participants [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%