2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Above- and Below-Ground Carbon Pools in Boreal Forests: The Case for Airborne Lidar

Abstract: A large and growing body of evidence has demonstrated that airborne scanning light detection and ranging (lidar) systems can be an effective tool in measuring and monitoring above-ground forest tree biomass. However, the potential of lidar as an all-round tool for assisting in assessment of carbon (C) stocks in soil and non-tree vegetation components of the forest ecosystem has been given much less attention. Here we combine the use airborne small footprint scanning lidar with fine-scale spatial C data relatin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All subset selection Seqrep was the most powerful selection method in agreement with Hansen et al [84] who also used similar best subset regression procedures to estimate biomass with ALS data. Spearman rho coefficients, proposed as a good tool for determining the relationships between ALS and field metrics by Kristensen et al [85], also showed a good result, agreeing with our previous studies [37]. Furthermore, our results agree with García-Gutiérrez et al [78], who found that stepwise was a powerless technique.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…All subset selection Seqrep was the most powerful selection method in agreement with Hansen et al [84] who also used similar best subset regression procedures to estimate biomass with ALS data. Spearman rho coefficients, proposed as a good tool for determining the relationships between ALS and field metrics by Kristensen et al [85], also showed a good result, agreeing with our previous studies [37]. Furthermore, our results agree with García-Gutiérrez et al [78], who found that stepwise was a powerless technique.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…(Kristensen et al 2015;Margolis et al 2015) and LIDAR in conjunction with SAR(Montesano et al 2014) or optical imagery (Goetz et al 2010; Bolton et al 2015; Langford et al 2016). LVIS data are also being used to characterize the tundra-taiga ecotone (after Callaghan et al 2002a, 2002b) and as control data in pan-Arctic digital elevation maps derived from high spatial resolution imagery such as ArcticDEM (https://pgc.umn.edu).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Airborne LiDAR data products alone have been used to quantify root mass at sub-hectare (>30 m) spatial scales in boreal and subtropical forests [58,59], and to scale GPR-based root mass in an oak savanna [21], highlighting potential for joining LiDAR and radar technologies to more comprehensively quantify and couple above-and belowground ecosystem structure. Our findings build on and advance these prior results by showing that remote sensing applications of coupled ground-based LiDAR and ground penetrating radar, which both operate at finer spatial scales, may provide an order of magnitude higher (<10 m) resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%