2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping and Dynamics of Regulatory DNA and Transcription Factor Networks in A. thaliana

Abstract: Our understanding of gene regulation in plants is constrained by our limited knowledge of plant cis-regulatory DNA and its dynamics. We mapped DNase I hypersensitive sites (DHSs) in A. thaliana seedlings and used genomic footprinting to delineate ∼ 700,000 sites of in vivo transcription factor (TF) occupancy at nucleotide resolution. We show that variation associated with 72 diverse quantitative phenotypes localizes within DHSs. TF footprints encode an extensive cis-regulatory lexicon subject to recent evoluti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
349
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(394 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(76 reference statements)
26
349
2
Order By: Relevance
“…DHS is considered to be a hallmark of regulatory DNA elements (Gross and Garrard 1988). In A. thaliana and rice, the DHSs contain the cis-regulatory elements bound by known TFs (Zhang et al 2012;Sullivan et al 2014;Wu et al 2014). Despite the differences in digestion mechanism and cleavage bias between MNase for determining nucleosome occupancy (Chung et al 2010;Vierstra et al 2014) and DNase I for revealing open chromatic regions (Sung et al 2014;Vierstra et al 2014), the positive correlation between motif-specific nucleosome depletion and heightened chromatin accessibility supports the notion that nucleosome-depleted motifs may be bound by TFs.…”
Section: G/c Content and Nucleosome Occupancymentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…DHS is considered to be a hallmark of regulatory DNA elements (Gross and Garrard 1988). In A. thaliana and rice, the DHSs contain the cis-regulatory elements bound by known TFs (Zhang et al 2012;Sullivan et al 2014;Wu et al 2014). Despite the differences in digestion mechanism and cleavage bias between MNase for determining nucleosome occupancy (Chung et al 2010;Vierstra et al 2014) and DNase I for revealing open chromatic regions (Sung et al 2014;Vierstra et al 2014), the positive correlation between motif-specific nucleosome depletion and heightened chromatin accessibility supports the notion that nucleosome-depleted motifs may be bound by TFs.…”
Section: G/c Content and Nucleosome Occupancymentioning
confidence: 68%
“…S3A). In addition, A. thaliana DHSs are located not only in proximal promoter regions but also within the gene body or in intergenic regions more distant from genes (Zhang et al 2012;Sullivan et al 2014). Furthermore, TFBSs located in gene bodies are important for transcriptional regulation (Stergachis et al 2013).…”
Section: Nucleosome Depletion and 6-mer Motif Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, binding site information is available for relatively few TFs and substantial TFBS coverage is only available for humans and several model organisms. Methods such as DNase hypersensitivity (DHS) assay or ATAC-seq offer more facile approaches for annotating genome-wide regulatory elements across many organisms and cell types (Buenrostro et al, 2015;Sullivan et al, 2014;Thurman et al, 2012). However, without comprehensive knowledge of TF sequence specificity, the targeting TFs of the identified regions cannot be readily verified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare replication timing profiles with DNase I hypersensitivity sites (DHSs), we used 809 the dataset (GEO accession PRJNA231710) described by Sullivan et al (2014). The density of 810 DHSs in each RT class ( Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%