2017
DOI: 10.1002/eap.1555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping and exploring variation in post‐fire vegetation recovery following mixed severity wildfire using airborne LiDAR

Abstract: There is a public perception that large high-severity wildfires decrease biodiversity and increase fire hazard by homogenizing vegetation composition and increasing the cover of mid-story vegetation. But a growing literature suggests that vegetation responses are nuanced. LiDAR technology provides a promising remote sensing tool to test hypotheses about post-fire vegetation regrowth because vegetation cover can be quantified within different height strata at fine scales over large areas. We assess the usefulne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This reiterates findings from studies to the north of our study region (the Mallee Fire and Biodiversity Project [54]), which showed that many habitat attributes continue to change for over a century following fire [19,55]. Also consistent with those and other studies [56][57][58] was the finding that the response of habitat attributes to fire is context dependent-in this instance, different rates of recovery of habitat attributes were apparent in different vegetation types. Despite differences between vegetation types, the strong influence of fire on several habitat attributes and the longevity of these effects mean that, in our study region, assumption 1 of the pyrodiversity hypothesis is supported.…”
Section: Does Fire Affect Termite Habitat Resources?supporting
confidence: 90%
“…This reiterates findings from studies to the north of our study region (the Mallee Fire and Biodiversity Project [54]), which showed that many habitat attributes continue to change for over a century following fire [19,55]. Also consistent with those and other studies [56][57][58] was the finding that the response of habitat attributes to fire is context dependent-in this instance, different rates of recovery of habitat attributes were apparent in different vegetation types. Despite differences between vegetation types, the strong influence of fire on several habitat attributes and the longevity of these effects mean that, in our study region, assumption 1 of the pyrodiversity hypothesis is supported.…”
Section: Does Fire Affect Termite Habitat Resources?supporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, research in nearby IF that had not burned for 35 years found denser canopies, with understory species composition dominated by shade-tolerant sedges and grasses [57]. The agreement between ground-based LAI and airborne lidar estimates of canopy density (R 2 of 0.11; data not shown) demonstrates the suitability of lidar technology for broader surveys of vegetation recovery from disturbance [25] and simpler and cheaper LAI methods appropriate at smaller scales.…”
Section: Vegetation Structure and Habitat Recoverymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…High resolution maps of the three-dimensional structure of forest canopies can inform biodiversity conservation efforts [23], because structurally complex canopies (such as those with several layers, or with a high variance of heights) indicate diverse species composition and plant ages and create a wide range of habitats supporting wildlife [24]. Spatially explicit maps of forest structure recovery following fires of different age, severity or intensity at high spatial resolution are increasingly used to inform fire management planning [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lidar's ability to provide data on important vegetation structure parameters makes the system ideal for monitoring vegetation recovery. Gordon et al [76] used lidar data to measure post-fire mid-story vegetation regrowth. They found that the metrics computed with the lidar data agreed with field derived metrics and provided a suitable representation of post-fire vegetation cover.…”
Section: Lidarmentioning
confidence: 99%