2015
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m115.638627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping and Quantitation of the Interaction between the Recombination Activating Gene Proteins RAG1 and RAG2

Abstract: Background: The RAG1-RAG2 interaction is critical for V(D)J recombination but is poorly understood. Results: The RAG1-RAG2 interaction has a binding constant of ϳ0.4 M and requires only a small portion of RAG1. Conclusion: RAG1 and RAG2 interact with modest affinity using regions of RAG1 flanking the RAG1 catalytic region. Significance: Inefficient association of RAG1 with RAG2 could help limit damage to the genome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on our current and prior findings, we conclude that any type of DSB induced anywhere in the genome of a pre-B cell has the potential to signal immediate cessation of Rag1 and Rag2 transcription, leading to rapid downregulation of Rag1 protein expression and thereby V(D)J recombination throughout the nucleus. Considering that immature T cells express an order of magnitude fewer number of Rag1 monomers than Rag2 monomers (59), DSB-induced downregulation of Rag1 protein in immature lymphocytes would be predicted to be a more effective way to reduce RAG activity than downregulation of Rag2 protein. In this context, the retention of Rag2 protein in thymocytes harboring RAG DSBs at TCR loci (60) may result from a long half-life of endogenous Rag2 protein enabling Rag2 to persists following DSB-induced repression of Rag1/Rag2 transcription and resultant loss of Rag1 protein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our current and prior findings, we conclude that any type of DSB induced anywhere in the genome of a pre-B cell has the potential to signal immediate cessation of Rag1 and Rag2 transcription, leading to rapid downregulation of Rag1 protein expression and thereby V(D)J recombination throughout the nucleus. Considering that immature T cells express an order of magnitude fewer number of Rag1 monomers than Rag2 monomers (59), DSB-induced downregulation of Rag1 protein in immature lymphocytes would be predicted to be a more effective way to reduce RAG activity than downregulation of Rag2 protein. In this context, the retention of Rag2 protein in thymocytes harboring RAG DSBs at TCR loci (60) may result from a long half-life of endogenous Rag2 protein enabling Rag2 to persists following DSB-induced repression of Rag1/Rag2 transcription and resultant loss of Rag1 protein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results and those from many studies of RAG2 −/− mice (e.g., Shinkai et al 1992) argue that RAG1 levels are sufficiently low in developing lymphocytes that RAG1-only recombination is exceedingly rare. A recent study estimated that mouse thymocytes contain, on average, only ∼1000 RAG1 dimers (Zhang et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lysates were prepared, and pull-downs were performed as previously described (Zhang et al 2015). Immunoblots were developed with anti-GST (Cell Signaling) and anti-MBP (New England Biolabs) antibodies.…”
Section: Pcr Assays For Coding and Signal Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our failure to detect cooperation between the RAG proteins in initial binding at J, while largely consistent with data from our previous ChIP-qPCR study (25), was notable in light of a recent in vitro kinetic analysis of RAG-mediated DNA cleavage, which predicted cooperation between RAG1 and RAG2 by virtue of their ability to recognize the RSS (RAG1) and H3K4me3 (RAG2) (44). This discrepancy might relate to differences in interactions with naked DNA in vitro and with chromatin in vivo as well as the need for RAG1 and RAG2 to associate with one another at their relatively low concentrations in vivo (45). This might be relevant for analyses of initial binding using an inducible expression system (as in this study), given that individually expressed RAG1 core and RAG2 core proteins interact with only a modest affinity, with a K D (equilibrium dissociation constant) value of ϳ0.4 M (45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%